TSTP Solution File: SWW375+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWW375+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:11:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 20.54s 4.87s
% Output : CNFRefutation 20.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 3 sgn; 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_WT__bodiesD,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( c_Com_OWT__bodies
=> ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X5) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X4)
=> hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X4)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4tyWtTeeFf/E---3.1_13805.p',fact_WT__bodiesD) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4tyWtTeeFf/E---3.1_13805.p',conj_1) ).
fof(conj_4,conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,v_y)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4tyWtTeeFf/E---3.1_13805.p',conj_4) ).
fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4tyWtTeeFf/E---3.1_13805.p',conj_3) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X14238,X14239] :
( ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X14239) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X14238)
| hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X14238)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_WT__bodiesD])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X2))
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,v_y)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,v_y)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWW375+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 22:57:07 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 1.22/1.45 Running first-order model finding
% 1.22/1.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4tyWtTeeFf/E---3.1_13805.p
% 20.54/4.87 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 20.54/4.87 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 20.54/4.87 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # sh5l with pid 13885 completed with status 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Result found by sh5l
% 20.54/4.87 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 20.54/4.87 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 20.54/4.87 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 20.54/4.87 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 13888 completed with status 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 20.54/4.87 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 20.54/4.87 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 20.54/4.87 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 20.54/4.87 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 20.54/4.87 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 20.54/4.87 # Preprocessing time : 0.146 s
% 20.54/4.87 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 20.54/4.87
% 20.54/4.87 # Proof found!
% 20.54/4.87 # SZS status Theorem
% 20.54/4.87 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 20.54/4.87 # Parsed axioms : 5230
% 20.54/4.87 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1128
% 20.54/4.87 # Initial clauses : 5835
% 20.54/4.87 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 129
% 20.54/4.87 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5706
% 20.54/4.87 # Processed clauses : 6284
% 20.54/4.87 # ...of these trivial : 193
% 20.54/4.87 # ...subsumed : 758
% 20.54/4.87 # ...remaining for further processing : 5333
% 20.54/4.87 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 426
% 20.54/4.87 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 20.54/4.87 # Backward-rewritten : 119
% 20.54/4.87 # Generated clauses : 426
% 20.54/4.87 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 341
% 20.54/4.87 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 22
% 20.54/4.87 # Paramodulations : 35
% 20.54/4.87 # Factorizations : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # NegExts : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Equation resolutions : 441
% 20.54/4.87 # Total rewrite steps : 5222
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional check models : 2
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional encoding time : 0.061
% 20.54/4.87 # Propositional solver time : 0.019
% 20.54/4.87 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 20.54/4.87 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 20.54/4.87 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 20.54/4.87 # Current number of processed clauses : 248
% 20.54/4.87 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 121
% 20.54/4.87 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Negative unit clauses : 63
% 20.54/4.87 # Non-unit-clauses : 64
% 20.54/4.87 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4348
% 20.54/4.87 # ...number of literals in the above : 10406
% 20.54/4.87 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Current number of archived clauses : 4711
% 20.54/4.87 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1976249
% 20.54/4.87 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 926026
% 20.54/4.87 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 690
% 20.54/4.87 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27481
% 20.54/4.87 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 148
% 20.54/4.87 # BW rewrite match attempts : 24949
% 20.54/4.87 # BW rewrite match successes : 365
% 20.54/4.87 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Condensation successes : 0
% 20.54/4.87 # Termbank termtop insertions : 971684
% 20.54/4.87
% 20.54/4.87 # -------------------------------------------------
% 20.54/4.87 # User time : 2.973 s
% 20.54/4.87 # System time : 0.096 s
% 20.54/4.87 # Total time : 3.069 s
% 20.54/4.87 # Maximum resident set size: 33004 pages
% 20.54/4.87
% 20.54/4.87 # -------------------------------------------------
% 20.54/4.87 # User time : 3.221 s
% 20.54/4.87 # System time : 0.109 s
% 20.54/4.87 # Total time : 3.330 s
% 20.54/4.87 # Maximum resident set size: 9564 pages
% 20.54/4.87 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------