TSTP Solution File: SWW374+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWW374+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:02:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.80s 3.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 11 unt; 2 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 14 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3184,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X1)
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_3184) ).
cnf(i_0_35,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_35) ).
cnf(i_0_2925,plain,
hAPP(c_Option_Othe(X1),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1),X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_2925) ).
cnf(i_0_3213,plain,
( hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),esk318_1(X1)) = hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_3213) ).
cnf(i_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_38) ).
cnf(i_0_624,plain,
( hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X4),X2),c_Map_Odom(X4,X3,X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_624) ).
cnf(i_0_37,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_3188,plain,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
| hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sbelw8s7/lgb.p',i_0_3188) ).
cnf(c_0_3222,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X1)
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies ),
i_0_3184 ).
cnf(c_0_3223,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
i_0_35 ).
cnf(c_0_3224,plain,
hAPP(c_Option_Othe(X1),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1),X2)) = X2,
i_0_2925 ).
cnf(c_0_3225,plain,
( hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),esk318_1(X1)) = hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))) ),
i_0_3213 ).
cnf(c_0_3226,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3222,c_0_3223])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3227,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)))),
i_0_38 ).
cnf(c_0_3228,plain,
( hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1)) = esk318_1(X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3224,c_0_3225]) ).
cnf(c_0_3229,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,esk318_1(X1)))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3226,c_0_3225]) ).
cnf(c_0_3230,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,esk318_1(v_pn)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3227,c_0_3228]) ).
cnf(c_0_3231,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,esk318_1(X1)))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_3229]) ).
cnf(c_0_3232,plain,
( hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X4),X2),c_Map_Odom(X4,X3,X1))) ),
i_0_624 ).
cnf(c_0_3233,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody))),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_3234,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3230,c_0_3231]) ).
cnf(c_0_3235,plain,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
| hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))) ),
i_0_3188 ).
cnf(c_0_3236,hypothesis,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3232,c_0_3233]) ).
cnf(c_0_3237,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3234,c_0_3235]),c_0_3236]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW374+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 14:21:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.48/0.69 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.69 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.48/0.69 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.48/0.69 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.80/3.60 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.80/3.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.80/3.60 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.80/3.60 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 10.80/3.60 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 10.80/3.60 #
% 10.80/3.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 10.80/3.60
% 10.80/3.60 # Proof found!
% 10.80/3.60 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.80/3.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.80/3.60 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.80/3.60
% 10.80/3.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.80/3.60 # User time : 0.210 s
% 10.80/3.60 # System time : 0.015 s
% 10.80/3.60 # Total time : 0.225 s
% 10.80/3.60 # Maximum resident set size: 9592 pages
% 10.80/3.60
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------