TSTP Solution File: SWW358+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW358+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.86s 2.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  19   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   3 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_finite__imageI,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X9),X8))
     => hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X7),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X9,X7,X6),X8))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_finite__imageI) ).

fof(fact_card__mono,axiom,
    ! [X11,X10,X9] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X9),X10))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X9,tc_HOL_Obool)),X11),X10))
       => hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X9),X11)),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X9),X10))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_card__mono) ).

fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Com_Opname),v_U)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_card__seteq,axiom,
    ! [X11,X10,X9] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X9),X10))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X9,tc_HOL_Obool)),X11),X10))
       => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X9),X10)),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X9),X11)))
         => X11 = X10 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_card__seteq) ).

fof(conj_2,hypothesis,
    hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(t_a),v_G) = hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(t_a),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_2) ).

fof(conj_4,conjecture,
    v_G = hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_4) ).

fof(fact_subset__refl,axiom,
    ! [X11,X9] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X9,tc_HOL_Obool)),X11),X11)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_subset__refl) ).

fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),v_G),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12,X13] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X13),X12))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X11),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X13,X11,X10),X12))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_finite__imageI])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X14),X13))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X14,tc_HOL_Obool)),X12),X13))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X14),X12)),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X14),X13))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_card__mono])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X2,X1,X3),X4)))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X2),X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Com_Opname),v_U)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X14),X13))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X14,tc_HOL_Obool)),X12),X13))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X14),X13)),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X14),X12)))
      | X12 = X13 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_card__seteq])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X1),X2)),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X1),X3)))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X3))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(t_a),v_G) = hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(t_a),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,X1,X2),v_U))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    v_G != hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X3),X2)),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(X3),X1)))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X3,tc_HOL_Obool)),X1),X2))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X3),X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(t_a),X1)),hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ocard(t_a),v_G)))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),X1),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X13,tc_HOL_Obool)),X12),X12)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_subset__refl]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    v_G != hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( v_G = X1
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),X1),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U)))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),v_G),X1))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(t_a),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),v_G),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    v_G != hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_15])]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SWW358+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 23:18:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.86/2.05  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.86/2.05  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.86/2.05  # Preprocessing time       : 0.239 s
% 0.86/2.05  
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof found!
% 0.86/2.05  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.86/2.05  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object total steps             : 26
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object clause steps            : 12
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object formula steps           : 14
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.86/2.05  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
% 0.86/2.05  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.86/2.05  # Parsed axioms                        : 5228
% 0.86/2.05  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5127
% 0.86/2.05  # Initial clauses                      : 134
% 0.86/2.05  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.86/2.05  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 134
% 0.86/2.05  # Processed clauses                    : 483
% 0.86/2.05  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.86/2.05  # ...subsumed                          : 166
% 0.86/2.05  # ...remaining for further processing  : 304
% 0.86/2.05  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 19
% 0.86/2.05  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.86/2.05  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.86/2.05  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.86/2.05  # Generated clauses                    : 6150
% 0.86/2.05  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 5845
% 0.86/2.05  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 27
% 0.86/2.05  # Paramodulations                      : 6110
% 0.86/2.05  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.86/2.05  # Equation resolutions                 : 34
% 0.86/2.05  # Current number of processed clauses  : 282
% 0.86/2.05  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 47
% 0.86/2.05  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 0.86/2.05  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.86/2.05  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 213
% 0.86/2.05  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5258
% 0.86/2.05  # ...number of literals in the above   : 13186
% 0.86/2.05  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.86/2.05  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.86/2.05  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6500
% 0.86/2.05  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5379
% 0.86/2.05  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 164
% 0.86/2.05  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 235
% 0.86/2.05  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 103
% 0.86/2.05  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1346
% 0.86/2.05  # BW rewrite match successes           : 24
% 0.86/2.05  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.86/2.05  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.86/2.05  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 350529
% 0.86/2.05  
% 0.86/2.05  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.86/2.05  # User time                : 0.400 s
% 0.86/2.05  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.86/2.05  # Total time               : 0.417 s
% 0.86/2.05  # Maximum resident set size: 17608 pages
% 0.87/24.04  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.87/24.05  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.87/24.06  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.06  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.06  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.06  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.06  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.06  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.87/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------