TSTP Solution File: SWW353+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW353+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.30s 26.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 29 ( 16 ~; 9 |; 1 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 22 ( 22 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 7 sgn 26 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_3,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pname))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_3) ).
fof(fact_MGT__def,axiom,
! [X15] : c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X15) = hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),c_fequal),X15),c_Natural_Oevalc(X15)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_MGT__def) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
! [X3] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X3),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody)))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X3))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
fof(fact_domI,axiom,
! [X10,X16,X5,X6,X96] :
( hAPP(X96,X6) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X5),X16)
=> hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X10),X6),c_Map_Odom(X10,X5,X96))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_domI) ).
fof(fact_domIff,axiom,
! [X96,X10,X6,X5] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X5),X6),c_Map_Odom(X5,X10,X96)))
<=> hAPP(X96,X6) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_domIff) ).
fof(conj_2,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pname) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_2) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pname))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pname))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X16] : c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X16) = hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),c_fequal),X16),c_Natural_Oevalc(X16)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_MGT__def]) ).
fof(c_0_9,hypothesis,
! [X4] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X4),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody)))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X4))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X97,X98,X99,X100,X101] :
( hAPP(X101,X100) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X99),X98)
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X97),X100),c_Map_Odom(X97,X99,X101))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_domI])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pname))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X1) = hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),c_fequal),X1),c_Natural_Oevalc(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X1),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X97,X98,X99,X100,X97,X98,X99,X100] :
( ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X100),X99),c_Map_Odom(X100,X98,X97)))
| hAPP(X97,X99) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X98) )
& ( hAPP(X97,X99) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X98)
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X100),X99),c_Map_Odom(X100,X98,X97))) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_domIff])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X3,X4)))
| hAPP(X4,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X3),X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),c_fequal),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pname)),c_Natural_Oevalc(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pname)))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),c_fequal),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)),c_Natural_Oevalc(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X1),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X4),X2),c_Map_Odom(X4,X3,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X3,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X3)))),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),v_pname),c_Map_Odom(tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom,c_Com_Obody))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X3,X4)))
| hAPP(X4,X2) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1),X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pname) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) = hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pname),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SWW353+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 04:48:07 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 1.29/24.37 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/24.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/25.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/26.09 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/26.92 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 1.30/26.92
% 1.30/26.92 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.30/26.92 # OLD status Res
% 1.30/26.92 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.30/26.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.317 s
% 1.30/26.92 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 1.30/26.92 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 1.30/26.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.238 s
% 1.30/26.92
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof found!
% 1.30/26.92 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.30/26.92 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object clause steps : 14
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object formula steps : 12
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 1.30/26.92 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 1.30/26.92 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.30/26.92 # Parsed axioms : 5245
% 1.30/26.92 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5128
% 1.30/26.92 # Initial clauses : 190
% 1.30/26.92 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 18
% 1.30/26.92 # Initial clauses in saturation : 172
% 1.30/26.92 # Processed clauses : 278
% 1.30/26.92 # ...of these trivial : 10
% 1.30/26.92 # ...subsumed : 78
% 1.30/26.92 # ...remaining for further processing : 190
% 1.30/26.92 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 1.30/26.92 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.30/26.92 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 1.30/26.92 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 1.30/26.92 # Generated clauses : 1427
% 1.30/26.92 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1217
% 1.30/26.92 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 1.30/26.92 # Paramodulations : 1404
% 1.30/26.92 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.30/26.92 # Equation resolutions : 24
% 1.30/26.92 # Current number of processed clauses : 177
% 1.30/26.92 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 40
% 1.30/26.92 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 1.30/26.92 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 1.30/26.92 # Non-unit-clauses : 124
% 1.30/26.92 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1057
% 1.30/26.92 # ...number of literals in the above : 2937
% 1.30/26.92 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.30/26.92 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 1.30/26.92 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5825
% 1.30/26.92 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3431
% 1.30/26.92 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 50
% 1.30/26.92 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 333
% 1.30/26.92 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.30/26.92 # BW rewrite match attempts : 312
% 1.30/26.92 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 1.30/26.92 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.30/26.92 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.30/26.92 # Termbank termtop insertions : 199220
% 1.30/26.92
% 1.30/26.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.30/26.92 # User time : 0.269 s
% 1.30/26.92 # System time : 0.006 s
% 1.30/26.92 # Total time : 0.275 s
% 1.30/26.92 # Maximum resident set size: 15076 pages
% 1.30/47.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/47.40 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.40 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/47.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/47.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/47.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/47.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.30/48.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.30/48.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.30/48.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------