TSTP Solution File: SWW352+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWW352+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:02:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.99s 3.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 11 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 30 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2216,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Fun_Ocomp(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mfj_uuvy/lgb.p',i_0_2216) ).
cnf(i_0_3249,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mfj_uuvy/lgb.p',i_0_3249) ).
cnf(i_0_2725,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1) != X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mfj_uuvy/lgb.p',i_0_2725) ).
cnf(i_0_2098,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mfj_uuvy/lgb.p',i_0_2098) ).
cnf(c_0_3254,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Fun_Ocomp(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
i_0_2216 ).
cnf(c_0_3255,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
i_0_3249 ).
cnf(c_0_3256,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1) != X1,
i_0_2725 ).
cnf(c_0_3257,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_Fun_Ocomp(X4,X5,X6,X7)),X8),X9) = hAPP(X7,hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3254,c_0_3255]) ).
cnf(c_0_3258,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_Fun_Ocomp(X4,X5,X6,c_Nat_OSuc)),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,hAPP(X7,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3256,c_0_3257]) ).
cnf(c_0_3259,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
i_0_2098 ).
cnf(c_0_3260,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_Fun_Ocomp(X4,X5,X6,c_Nat_OSuc)),c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat)),X7) != hAPP(X7,X7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3258,c_0_3259]) ).
cnf(c_0_3261,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_3260]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWW352+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 13:05:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.51 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.56/0.76 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.76 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.56/0.76 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.56/0.76 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.99/3.78 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.99/3.78 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.99/3.78 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.99/3.78 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.99/3.78 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.99/3.78 #
% 9.99/3.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 9.99/3.78 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.99/3.78
% 9.99/3.78 # Proof found!
% 9.99/3.78 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.99/3.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.99/3.78 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.99/3.78
% 9.99/3.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.99/3.78 # User time : 0.062 s
% 9.99/3.78 # System time : 0.008 s
% 9.99/3.78 # Total time : 0.070 s
% 9.99/3.78 # Maximum resident set size: 9688 pages
% 9.99/3.78
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------