TSTP Solution File: SWW350+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWW350+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:09:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.98s 2.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  13   ~;  15   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn;  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_com__det,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X7),X6),X5))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X7),X6),X4))
       => X4 = X5 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pqvtIcFHrz/E---3.1_10760.p',fact_com__det) ).

fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
    ! [X333] :
      ( ! [X30] :
          ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),X30))
         => X333 = X30 )
     => X333 = v_s_H ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pqvtIcFHrz/E---3.1_10760.p',conj_1) ).

fof(conj_3,conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),v_s_H)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pqvtIcFHrz/E---3.1_10760.p',conj_3) ).

fof(fact_com_Osimps_I18_J,axiom,
    ! [X69] : c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP != hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X69),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pqvtIcFHrz/E---3.1_10760.p',fact_com_Osimps_I18_J) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X346,X347,X348,X349] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X349),X348),X347))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X349),X348),X346))
      | X346 = X347 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_com__det])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
    ! [X334] :
      ( ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),esk1_1(X334)))
        | X334 = v_s_H )
      & ( X334 != esk1_1(X334)
        | X334 = v_s_H ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X4 = X3
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X1),X2),X3))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X1),X2),X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),esk1_1(X1)))
    | X1 = v_s_H ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = esk1_1(X2)
    | X2 = v_s_H
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = v_s_H
    | X1 != esk1_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = esk1_1(X2)
    | X1 = v_s_H
    | X2 = v_s_H ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = v_s_H
    | X2 = v_s_H
    | esk1_1(X1) != X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),v_s_H)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_3])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X468] : c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP != hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X468),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_com_Osimps_I18_J]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = v_s_H
    | X1 = v_s_H ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),v_s_H)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP != hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    X1 = v_s_H,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.86/0.90  % Problem    : SWW350+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.86/0.91  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.93/1.11  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.93/1.11  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.93/1.11  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.93/1.11  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.93/1.11  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.93/1.11  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.93/1.11  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.93/1.11  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 22:22:58 EDT 2023
% 0.93/1.11  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.81/2.01  Running first-order theorem proving
% 1.81/2.01  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.pqvtIcFHrz/E---3.1_10760.p
% 1.98/2.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 1.98/2.45  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.98/2.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # new_bool_1 with pid 10840 completed with status 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.98/2.45  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.98/2.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.98/2.45  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.98/2.45  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 10842 completed with status 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 1.98/2.45  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.98/2.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.98/2.45  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.98/2.45  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.98/2.45  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 1.98/2.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 1.98/2.45  
% 1.98/2.45  # Proof found!
% 1.98/2.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.98/2.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.98/2.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 5229
% 1.98/2.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4785
% 1.98/2.45  # Initial clauses                      : 678
% 1.98/2.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 29
% 1.98/2.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 649
% 1.98/2.45  # Processed clauses                    : 957
% 1.98/2.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 56
% 1.98/2.45  # ...subsumed                          : 319
% 1.98/2.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 582
% 1.98/2.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 135
% 1.98/2.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 10
% 1.98/2.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 544
% 1.98/2.45  # Generated clauses                    : 9083
% 1.98/2.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8366
% 1.98/2.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 1.98/2.45  # Paramodulations                      : 8894
% 1.98/2.45  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 1.98/2.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 184
% 1.98/2.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2436
% 1.98/2.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.98/2.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.98/2.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.98/2.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.98/2.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.98/2.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 5
% 1.98/2.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 1.98/2.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.98/2.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 1.98/2.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 1.98/2.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7950
% 1.98/2.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 26130
% 1.98/2.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 554
% 1.98/2.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34202
% 1.98/2.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25375
% 1.98/2.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 191
% 1.98/2.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1772
% 1.98/2.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 27
% 1.98/2.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2606
% 1.98/2.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 911
% 1.98/2.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.98/2.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 449660
% 1.98/2.45  
% 1.98/2.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.98/2.45  # User time                : 0.251 s
% 1.98/2.45  # System time              : 0.024 s
% 1.98/2.45  # Total time               : 0.275 s
% 1.98/2.45  # Maximum resident set size: 11224 pages
% 1.98/2.45  
% 1.98/2.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.98/2.45  # User time                : 0.390 s
% 1.98/2.45  # System time              : 0.029 s
% 1.98/2.45  # Total time               : 0.419 s
% 1.98/2.45  # Maximum resident set size: 9592 pages
% 1.98/2.45  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.98/2.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------