TSTP Solution File: SWW349+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWW349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:02:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.42s 3.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   7 unt;   6 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (  22 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_264,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X3),X4),X2))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X3),X4),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k47kh4_x/lgb.p',i_0_264) ).

cnf(i_0_23,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = v_s_H
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),esk1_1(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k47kh4_x/lgb.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_22,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = v_s_H
    | esk1_1(X1) != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k47kh4_x/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_2415,plain,
    ( esk211_0 != esk212_0
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k47kh4_x/lgb.p',i_0_2415) ).

cnf(i_0_21,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k47kh4_x/lgb.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),v_s_H)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-k47kh4_x/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(c_0_2422,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X3),X4),X2))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(X3),X4),X1)) ),
    i_0_264 ).

cnf(c_0_2423,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = v_s_H
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),esk1_1(X1))) ),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_2424,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = esk1_1(X2)
    | X2 = v_s_H
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2422,c_0_2423]) ).

cnf(c_0_2425,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = v_s_H
    | esk1_1(X1) != X1 ),
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_2426,hypothesis,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = esk1_1(X2)
    | X1 = v_s_H
    | X2 = v_s_H ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2424,c_0_2423]) ).

cnf(c_0_2427,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = v_s_H
    | X2 = v_s_H
    | esk1_1(X1) != X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2425,c_0_2426]) ).

cnf(c_0_2428,plain,
    ( esk211_0 != esk212_0
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
    i_0_2415 ).

cnf(c_0_2429,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_2430,hypothesis,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = v_s_H
    | X1 = v_s_H ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2427]) ).

cnf(c_0_2431,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc(v_c),v_Z),v_s_H)),
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_2432,plain,
    esk211_0 != esk212_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2428,c_0_2429])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2433,hypothesis,
    X1 = v_s_H,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2423,c_0_2430]),c_0_2431]) ).

cnf(c_0_2434,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2432,c_0_2433]),c_0_2433])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SWW349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 07:25:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.51  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.59/0.77  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.77  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.59/0.77  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.59/0.77  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.42/3.55  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.42/3.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.42/3.55  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.42/3.55  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 9.42/3.55  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 9.42/3.55  #
% 9.42/3.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 9.42/3.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.42/3.55  
% 9.42/3.55  # Proof found!
% 9.42/3.55  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.42/3.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.42/3.55  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.42/3.55  
% 9.42/3.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.42/3.55  # User time                : 0.055 s
% 9.42/3.55  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 9.42/3.55  # Total time               : 0.066 s
% 9.42/3.55  # Maximum resident set size: 9492 pages
% 9.42/3.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------