TSTP Solution File: SWW347+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW347+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.91s 160.09s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 9 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 26 sgn 26 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_impossible__Cons,axiom,
! [X90,X280,X275,X5] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X5)),X275)),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X5)),X280)))
=> X275 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X5),X90),X280) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_impossible__Cons) ).
fof(fact_le__refl,axiom,
! [X91] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),X91),X91)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_le__refl) ).
fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
! [X35,X23,X24,X5,X64,X18] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X18,X64,X5),X24),X23),X35) = hAPP(hAPP(X24,X35),hAPP(X23,X35)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',help_c__COMBS__1) ).
fof(fact_Collect__def,axiom,
! [X24,X5] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X5),X24) = X24,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_Collect__def) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X281,X282,X283,X284] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X284)),X283)),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X284)),X282)))
| X283 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X284),X281),X282) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_impossible__Cons])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X92] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),X92),X92)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_le__refl]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( X1 != hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X2),X3),X4)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X2)),X1)),hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_List_Olist(X2)),X4))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat),X1),X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X65,X66,X67,X68,X69,X70] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X70,X69,X68),X67),X66),X65) = hAPP(hAPP(X67,X65),hAPP(X66,X65)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1),X2),X3) != X3,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X25,X26] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X26),X25) = X25,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Collect__def]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),X8),X9) != hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9)),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_Set_OCollect(X8)),X9) != hAPP(X9,X9),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW347+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 18:01:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.05/24.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.05/24.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.05/24.11 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.05/24.12 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.20/47.11 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.20/47.12 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.20/47.12 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.20/47.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/70.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/70.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/70.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.34/70.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.50/93.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.50/93.16 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.50/93.17 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.50/93.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/116.17 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/116.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/116.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.65/116.20 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.78/139.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.78/139.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.78/139.21 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.78/139.23 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.91/160.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.91/160.09 # OLD status Res
% 1.91/160.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.924 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.91/160.09 # OLD status Res
% 1.91/160.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 1.91/160.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.256 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.91/160.09 # OLD status Res
% 1.91/160.09 # Preprocessing time : 1.026 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.91/160.09 # OLD status Res
% 1.91/160.09 # Preprocessing time : 1.103 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.91/160.09 # OLD status Res
% 1.91/160.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.773 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.91/160.09 # OLD status Res
% 1.91/160.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.91/160.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.161 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e60008599937a0dc787316fd87bf9ff4d65ffb48 for 23 seconds:
% 1.91/160.09 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.91/160.09 # Preprocessing time : 0.303 s
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof found!
% 1.91/160.09 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.91/160.09 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 1.91/160.09 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 0
% 1.91/160.09 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.91/160.09 # Parsed axioms : 5243
% 1.91/160.09 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4016
% 1.91/160.09 # Initial clauses : 1835
% 1.91/160.09 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 72
% 1.91/160.09 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1763
% 1.91/160.09 # Processed clauses : 6080
% 1.91/160.09 # ...of these trivial : 164
% 1.91/160.09 # ...subsumed : 3804
% 1.91/160.09 # ...remaining for further processing : 2112
% 1.91/160.09 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 792
% 1.91/160.09 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 241340
% 1.91/160.09 # Backward-subsumed : 96
% 1.91/160.09 # Backward-rewritten : 673
% 1.91/160.09 # Generated clauses : 882696
% 1.91/160.09 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 871951
% 1.91/160.09 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 413
% 1.91/160.09 # Paramodulations : 881689
% 1.91/160.09 # Factorizations : 168
% 1.91/160.09 # Equation resolutions : 840
% 1.91/160.09 # Current number of processed clauses : 1312
% 1.91/160.09 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 329
% 1.91/160.09 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 31
% 1.91/160.09 # Negative unit clauses : 75
% 1.91/160.09 # Non-unit-clauses : 877
% 1.91/160.09 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65684
% 1.91/160.09 # ...number of literals in the above : 192554
% 1.91/160.09 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.91/160.09 # Current number of archived clauses : 771
% 1.91/160.09 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 293631
% 1.91/160.09 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 196389
% 1.91/160.09 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3824
% 1.91/160.09 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17559
% 1.91/160.09 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 86
% 1.91/160.09 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5267
% 1.91/160.09 # BW rewrite match successes : 405
% 1.91/160.09 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.91/160.09 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.91/160.09 # Termbank termtop insertions : 24922045
% 1.91/160.09
% 1.91/160.09 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.91/160.09 # User time : 19.706 s
% 1.91/160.09 # System time : 0.149 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Total time : 19.855 s
% 1.91/160.09 # Maximum resident set size: 166956 pages
% 1.91/162.21 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.91/162.21 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.91/162.22 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.91/162.22 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.23 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.91/162.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.91/162.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.91/162.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.25 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.26 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.26 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.26 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.91/162.27 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/162.27 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------