TSTP Solution File: SWW345+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWW345+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:11:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 6.35s 300.14s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn; 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_2,hypothesis,
! [X9,X10] :
( v_Q(X9,X10)
=> ! [X11] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,X10,v_n,X11)
=> v_R(X9,X11) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ploLvaT6GE/E---3.1_13061.p',conj_2) ).
fof(conj_6,conjecture,
v_R(v_Z,v_s_H),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ploLvaT6GE/E---3.1_13061.p',conj_6) ).
fof(conj_5,hypothesis,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,v_s1,v_n,v_s_H),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ploLvaT6GE/E---3.1_13061.p',conj_5) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
! [X9,X10] :
( v_P(X9,X10)
=> ! [X11] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,X10,v_n,X11)
=> v_Q(X9,X11) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ploLvaT6GE/E---3.1_13061.p',conj_1) ).
fof(conj_4,hypothesis,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,v_s,v_n,v_s1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ploLvaT6GE/E---3.1_13061.p',conj_4) ).
fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
v_P(v_Z,v_s),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ploLvaT6GE/E---3.1_13061.p',conj_3) ).
fof(c_0_6,hypothesis,
! [X334,X335,X336] :
( ~ v_Q(X334,X335)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,X335,v_n,X336)
| v_R(X334,X336) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ v_R(v_Z,v_s_H),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( v_R(X1,X3)
| ~ v_Q(X1,X2)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,X2,v_n,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_d,v_s1,v_n,v_s_H),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_5]) ).
fof(c_0_10,hypothesis,
! [X331,X332,X333] :
( ~ v_P(X331,X332)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,X332,v_n,X333)
| v_Q(X331,X333) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ v_R(v_Z,v_s_H),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( v_R(X1,v_s_H)
| ~ v_Q(X1,v_s1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( v_Q(X1,X3)
| ~ v_P(X1,X2)
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,X2,v_n,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
c_Natural_Oevaln(v_c,v_s,v_n,v_s1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ v_Q(v_Z,v_s1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( v_Q(X1,v_s1)
| ~ v_P(X1,v_s) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
v_P(v_Z,v_s),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10 % Problem : SWW345+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.05/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 22:58:31 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 1.28/1.53 Running first-order model finding
% 1.28/1.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ploLvaT6GE/E---3.1_13061.p
% 6.35/300.14 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 6.35/300.14 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 6.35/300.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # new_bool_3 with pid 13173 completed with status 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 6.35/300.14 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 6.35/300.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.35/300.14 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 6.35/300.14 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 23s (1) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13177 completed with status 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.35/300.14 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 6.35/300.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 6.35/300.14 # Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 6.35/300.14 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 6.35/300.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 23s (1) cores
% 6.35/300.14 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 6.35/300.14 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.35/300.14
% 6.35/300.14 # Proof found!
% 6.35/300.14 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.35/300.14 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.35/300.14 # Parsed axioms : 5211
% 6.35/300.14 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4451
% 6.35/300.14 # Initial clauses : 1144
% 6.35/300.14 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 56
% 6.35/300.14 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1088
% 6.35/300.14 # Processed clauses : 1894
% 6.35/300.14 # ...of these trivial : 35
% 6.35/300.14 # ...subsumed : 263
% 6.35/300.14 # ...remaining for further processing : 1596
% 6.35/300.14 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 295
% 6.35/300.14 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 6.35/300.14 # Backward-rewritten : 21
% 6.35/300.14 # Generated clauses : 15753
% 6.35/300.14 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14022
% 6.35/300.14 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 6.35/300.14 # Paramodulations : 15417
% 6.35/300.14 # Factorizations : 8
% 6.35/300.14 # NegExts : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Equation resolutions : 339
% 6.35/300.14 # Total rewrite steps : 5330
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional check models : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 6.35/300.14 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 6.35/300.14 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 6.35/300.14 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 6.35/300.14 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 6.35/300.14 # Current number of processed clauses : 746
% 6.35/300.14 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 156
% 6.35/300.14 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 21
% 6.35/300.14 # Negative unit clauses : 49
% 6.35/300.14 # Non-unit-clauses : 520
% 6.35/300.14 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13959
% 6.35/300.14 # ...number of literals in the above : 37819
% 6.35/300.14 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Current number of archived clauses : 770
% 6.35/300.14 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 112314
% 6.35/300.14 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90459
% 6.35/300.14 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 202
% 6.35/300.14 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2739
% 6.35/300.14 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3502
% 6.35/300.14 # BW rewrite match successes : 184
% 6.35/300.14 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.35/300.14 # Termbank termtop insertions : 760730
% 6.35/300.14
% 6.35/300.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.35/300.14 # User time : 0.640 s
% 6.35/300.14 # System time : 0.026 s
% 6.35/300.14 # Total time : 0.666 s
% 6.35/300.14 # Maximum resident set size: 11820 pages
% 6.35/300.14
% 6.35/300.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.35/300.14 # User time : 0.877 s
% 6.35/300.14 # System time : 0.043 s
% 6.35/300.14 # Total time : 0.920 s
% 6.35/300.14 # Maximum resident set size: 9540 pages
% 6.35/300.14 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------