TSTP Solution File: SWW337+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW337+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.93s 2.12s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  15   ~;  11   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   6 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
    ! [X11] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X3),v_G))
         => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,X11,X3) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X3),v_ts))
         => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,X11,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).

fof(fact_mem__def,axiom,
    ! [X5,X13,X6] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X6),X13),X5))
    <=> hBOOL(hAPP(X5,X13)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_mem__def) ).

fof(fact_subsetD,axiom,
    ! [X44,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X6,tc_HOL_Obool)),X5),X4))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X6),X44),X5))
       => hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X6),X44),X4)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_subsetD) ).

fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_G)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X11] :
        ( ! [X3] :
            ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X3),v_G))
           => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,X11,X3) )
       => ! [X3] :
            ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X3),v_ts))
           => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,X11,X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16,X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X16),X15),X14))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(X14,X15)) )
      & ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X14,X15))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X16),X15),X14)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_mem__def])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X13] :
      ( ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X13),v_G))
        | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,esk1_0,X13) )
      & hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),esk2_0),v_ts))
      & ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X45,X46,X47,X48] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X48,tc_HOL_Obool)),X47),X46))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X48),X45),X47))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X48),X45),X46)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_subsetD])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X3),X2),X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),esk2_0),v_ts)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X1),v_G)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),X3))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),X4))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),X4),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_G)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),X3))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(v_ts,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),esk2_0),v_G)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X1),v_G))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X1),v_ts)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),esk2_0),v_ts)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06  % Problem  : SWW337+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.06/0.25  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.06/0.25  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 05:52:37 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.93/2.12  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.93/2.12  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.93/2.12  # Preprocessing time       : 0.228 s
% 0.93/2.12  
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof found!
% 0.93/2.12  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.93/2.12  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object total steps             : 20
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object clause steps            : 12
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 6
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.93/2.12  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.93/2.12  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.93/2.12  # Parsed axioms                        : 5226
% 0.93/2.12  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5125
% 0.93/2.12  # Initial clauses                      : 142
% 0.93/2.12  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
% 0.93/2.12  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 126
% 0.93/2.12  # Processed clauses                    : 134
% 0.93/2.12  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.93/2.12  # ...subsumed                          : 24
% 0.93/2.12  # ...remaining for further processing  : 109
% 0.93/2.12  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 17
% 0.93/2.12  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.93/2.12  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.93/2.12  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.93/2.12  # Generated clauses                    : 341
% 0.93/2.12  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 263
% 0.93/2.12  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.93/2.12  # Paramodulations                      : 315
% 0.93/2.12  # Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.93/2.12  # Equation resolutions                 : 18
% 0.93/2.12  # Current number of processed clauses  : 87
% 0.93/2.12  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.93/2.12  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.93/2.12  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 0.93/2.12  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 58
% 0.93/2.12  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 248
% 0.93/2.12  # ...number of literals in the above   : 540
% 0.93/2.12  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.93/2.12  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.93/2.12  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 502
% 0.93/2.12  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 488
% 0.93/2.12  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 25
% 0.93/2.12  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 92
% 0.93/2.12  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.93/2.12  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 40
% 0.93/2.12  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.93/2.12  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.93/2.12  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.93/2.12  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 147870
% 0.93/2.12  
% 0.93/2.12  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/2.12  # User time                : 0.225 s
% 0.93/2.12  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.93/2.12  # Total time               : 0.238 s
% 0.93/2.12  # Maximum resident set size: 13412 pages
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.93/24.12  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/24.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.93/24.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.93/24.19  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------