TSTP Solution File: SWW324+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWW324+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:02:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.26s 3.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 11 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 30 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2073,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Fun_Ocomp(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fvcfo805/lgb.p',i_0_2073) ).
cnf(i_0_3270,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fvcfo805/lgb.p',i_0_3270) ).
cnf(i_0_2743,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1) != X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fvcfo805/lgb.p',i_0_2743) ).
cnf(i_0_1939,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fvcfo805/lgb.p',i_0_1939) ).
cnf(c_0_3275,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Fun_Ocomp(X1,X2,X3,X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
i_0_2073 ).
cnf(c_0_3276,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
i_0_3270 ).
cnf(c_0_3277,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1) != X1,
i_0_2743 ).
cnf(c_0_3278,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_Fun_Ocomp(X4,X5,X6,X7)),X8),X9) = hAPP(X7,hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3275,c_0_3276]) ).
cnf(c_0_3279,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_Fun_Ocomp(X4,X5,X6,c_Nat_OSuc)),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,hAPP(X7,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3277,c_0_3278]) ).
cnf(c_0_3280,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
i_0_1939 ).
cnf(c_0_3281,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_Fun_Ocomp(X4,X5,X6,c_Nat_OSuc)),c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat)),X7) != hAPP(X7,X7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3279,c_0_3280]) ).
cnf(c_0_3282,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_3281]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW324+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 08:50:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.53/0.73 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.73 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.53/0.73 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.53/0.73 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.26/3.80 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.26/3.80 # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.26/3.80 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.26/3.80 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 10.26/3.80 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 10.26/3.80 #
% 10.26/3.80 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 10.26/3.80 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.26/3.80
% 10.26/3.80 # Proof found!
% 10.26/3.80 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.26/3.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.26/3.80 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.26/3.80
% 10.26/3.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.26/3.80 # User time : 0.047 s
% 10.26/3.80 # System time : 0.010 s
% 10.26/3.80 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 10.26/3.80 # Maximum resident set size: 9516 pages
% 10.26/3.80
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------