TSTP Solution File: SWW319+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWW319+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:01:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.41s 3.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 11 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 30 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2860,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-67anbh5z/lgb.p',i_0_2860) ).
cnf(i_0_2863,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-67anbh5z/lgb.p',i_0_2863) ).
cnf(i_0_2401,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1) != X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-67anbh5z/lgb.p',i_0_2401) ).
cnf(i_0_1770,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-67anbh5z/lgb.p',i_0_1770) ).
cnf(c_0_2868,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
i_0_2860 ).
cnf(c_0_2869,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
i_0_2863 ).
cnf(c_0_2870,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1) != X1,
i_0_2401 ).
cnf(c_0_2871,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),X7)),X8),X9) = hAPP(X7,hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2868,c_0_2869]) ).
cnf(c_0_2872,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Nat_OSuc)),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,hAPP(X7,X8)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2870,c_0_2871]) ).
cnf(c_0_2873,plain,
hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
i_0_1770 ).
cnf(c_0_2874,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Nat_OSuc)),c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat)),X7) != hAPP(X7,X7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2872,c_0_2873]) ).
cnf(c_0_2875,plain,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2874]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SWW319+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 00:41:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.48/0.69 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.69 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.48/0.69 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.48/0.69 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.41/3.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.41/3.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.41/3.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.41/3.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.41/3.39 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.41/3.39 #
% 9.41/3.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 9.41/3.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.41/3.39
% 9.41/3.39 # Proof found!
% 9.41/3.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.41/3.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.41/3.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.41/3.39
% 9.41/3.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.41/3.39 # User time : 0.073 s
% 9.41/3.39 # System time : 0.010 s
% 9.41/3.39 # Total time : 0.083 s
% 9.41/3.39 # Maximum resident set size: 9628 pages
% 9.41/3.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------