TSTP Solution File: SWW317+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW317+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s 2.08s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).

fof(fact_hoare__derivs_OSkip,axiom,
    ! [X6,X4,X5] : c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X5,X6,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X6)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_hoare__derivs_OSkip) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] : c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X9,X8,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X9)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X9,X7,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X7)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X9),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_hoare__derivs_OSkip]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a,v_P,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,v_P)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1)),c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X1,X3,c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X3)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SWW317+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 12:45:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.90/2.08  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.90/2.08  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.90/2.08  # Preprocessing time       : 0.232 s
% 0.90/2.08  
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof found!
% 0.90/2.08  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.90/2.08  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object total steps             : 8
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object clause steps            : 3
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.90/2.08  # Parsed axioms                        : 5242
% 0.90/2.08  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5141
% 0.90/2.08  # Initial clauses                      : 130
% 0.90/2.08  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.90/2.08  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 129
% 0.90/2.08  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 0.90/2.08  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.90/2.08  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.90/2.08  # ...remaining for further processing  : 23
% 0.90/2.08  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.90/2.08  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.90/2.08  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.90/2.08  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.90/2.08  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96
% 0.90/2.08  # ...number of literals in the above   : 215
% 0.90/2.08  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.90/2.08  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 17
% 0.90/2.08  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.90/2.08  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.90/2.08  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 139293
% 0.90/2.08  
% 0.90/2.08  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/2.08  # User time                : 0.225 s
% 0.90/2.08  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.90/2.08  # Total time               : 0.233 s
% 0.90/2.08  # Maximum resident set size: 13156 pages
% 0.90/24.08  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.12  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------