TSTP Solution File: SWW315+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW315+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.95s 2.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   8   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_weaken,axiom,
    ! [X5,X7,X4,X6] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X7)
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X6),tc_HOL_Obool)),X5),X7))
       => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_weaken) ).

fof(conj_4,conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_4) ).

fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_ts_H)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).

fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts_H),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_3) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X11,X10,X9)
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X11),tc_HOL_Obool)),X8),X9))
      | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X11,X10,X8) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_weaken])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1),tc_HOL_Obool)),X3),X4))
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_ts_H)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,X1,v_ts)
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,X1,v_ts_H) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts_H),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SWW315+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 01:26:48 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.95/2.13  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.95/2.13  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.95/2.13  # Preprocessing time       : 0.232 s
% 0.95/2.13  
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof found!
% 0.95/2.13  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.95/2.13  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object total steps             : 13
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.95/2.13  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 0.95/2.13  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.95/2.13  # Parsed axioms                        : 5230
% 0.95/2.13  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5129
% 0.95/2.13  # Initial clauses                      : 134
% 0.95/2.13  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.95/2.13  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 132
% 0.95/2.13  # Processed clauses                    : 139
% 0.95/2.13  # ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.95/2.13  # ...subsumed                          : 32
% 0.95/2.13  # ...remaining for further processing  : 103
% 0.95/2.13  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 18
% 0.95/2.13  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Generated clauses                    : 311
% 0.95/2.13  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 229
% 0.95/2.13  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Paramodulations                      : 284
% 0.95/2.13  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.95/2.13  # Equation resolutions                 : 24
% 0.95/2.13  # Current number of processed clauses  : 86
% 0.95/2.13  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.95/2.13  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.95/2.13  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.95/2.13  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 52
% 0.95/2.13  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 222
% 0.95/2.13  # ...number of literals in the above   : 433
% 0.95/2.13  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 410
% 0.95/2.13  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 383
% 0.95/2.13  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 25
% 0.95/2.13  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.95/2.13  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 61
% 0.95/2.13  # BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.95/2.13  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.95/2.13  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 148492
% 0.95/2.13  
% 0.95/2.13  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/2.13  # User time                : 0.231 s
% 0.95/2.13  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.95/2.13  # Total time               : 0.241 s
% 0.95/2.13  # Maximum resident set size: 13424 pages
% 0.95/24.13  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.95/24.13  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/24.20  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------