TSTP Solution File: SWW315+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWW315+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:09:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.99s 3.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 9 ~; 7 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_cut,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X8,X6] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X8,X5)
=> ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X8)
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XGEMFvoyFc/E---3.1_19592.p',fact_cut) ).
fof(fact_asm,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X6),tc_HOL_Obool)),X5),X4))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XGEMFvoyFc/E---3.1_19592.p',fact_asm) ).
fof(conj_4,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XGEMFvoyFc/E---3.1_19592.p',conj_4) ).
fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts_H),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XGEMFvoyFc/E---3.1_19592.p',conj_3) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_ts_H)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XGEMFvoyFc/E---3.1_19592.p',conj_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X290,X291,X292,X293] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X293,X292,X291)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X293,X290,X292)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X293,X290,X291) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_cut])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X283,X284,X285] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X285),tc_HOL_Obool)),X284),X283))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X285,X283,X284) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_asm])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts_H),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1),tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)),v_ts),v_ts_H)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,X1)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_ts_H,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_ts_H,v_ts),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 1.12/1.20 % Problem : SWW315+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 1.12/1.21 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 1.23/1.41 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 1.23/1.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 1.23/1.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 1.23/1.41 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 1.23/1.41 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 1.23/1.41 % CPULimit : 2400
% 1.23/1.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 1.23/1.41 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 22:58:23 EDT 2023
% 1.23/1.41 % CPUTime :
% 2.32/2.60 Running first-order theorem proving
% 2.32/2.60 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.XGEMFvoyFc/E---3.1_19592.p
% 3.99/3.28 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 3.99/3.28 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.99/3.28 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # new_bool_3 with pid 19687 completed with status 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 3.99/3.28 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.99/3.28 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.99/3.28 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 3.99/3.28 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 19690 completed with status 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 3.99/3.28 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.99/3.28 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.99/3.28 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 3.99/3.28 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.99/3.28 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 3.99/3.28 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 3.99/3.28
% 3.99/3.28 # Proof found!
% 3.99/3.28 # SZS status Theorem
% 3.99/3.28 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.99/3.28 # Parsed axioms : 5230
% 3.99/3.28 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4781
% 3.99/3.28 # Initial clauses : 665
% 3.99/3.28 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 31
% 3.99/3.28 # Initial clauses in saturation : 634
% 3.99/3.28 # Processed clauses : 639
% 3.99/3.28 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 3.99/3.28 # ...subsumed : 116
% 3.99/3.28 # ...remaining for further processing : 517
% 3.99/3.28 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 93
% 3.99/3.28 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 3.99/3.28 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 3.99/3.28 # Generated clauses : 10381
% 3.99/3.28 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9158
% 3.99/3.28 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 3.99/3.28 # Paramodulations : 10261
% 3.99/3.28 # Factorizations : 8
% 3.99/3.28 # NegExts : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Equation resolutions : 113
% 3.99/3.28 # Total rewrite steps : 3098
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional check models : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 3.99/3.28 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 3.99/3.28 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 3.99/3.28 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 3.99/3.28 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 3.99/3.28 # Current number of processed clauses : 483
% 3.99/3.28 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 109
% 3.99/3.28 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 3.99/3.28 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 3.99/3.28 # Non-unit-clauses : 347
% 3.99/3.28 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9153
% 3.99/3.28 # ...number of literals in the above : 25698
% 3.99/3.28 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 3.99/3.28 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20445
% 3.99/3.28 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16434
% 3.99/3.28 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 112
% 3.99/3.28 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 439
% 3.99/3.28 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 29
% 3.99/3.28 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1618
% 3.99/3.28 # BW rewrite match successes : 78
% 3.99/3.28 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.99/3.28 # Termbank termtop insertions : 520470
% 3.99/3.28
% 3.99/3.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.99/3.28 # User time : 0.377 s
% 3.99/3.28 # System time : 0.028 s
% 3.99/3.28 # Total time : 0.405 s
% 3.99/3.28 # Maximum resident set size: 11168 pages
% 3.99/3.28
% 3.99/3.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.99/3.28 # User time : 0.627 s
% 3.99/3.28 # System time : 0.040 s
% 3.99/3.28 # Total time : 0.667 s
% 3.99/3.28 # Maximum resident set size: 9492 pages
% 3.99/3.28 % E---3.1 exiting
% 3.99/3.28 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------