TSTP Solution File: SWW314+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SWW314+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:03:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.07s 1.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_5,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbDQgt2gNt/E---3.1_32742.p',conj_5) ).
fof(fact_cut,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X8,X6] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X8,X5)
=> ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X8)
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X6,X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbDQgt2gNt/E---3.1_32742.p',fact_cut) ).
fof(conj_4,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_G_H),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbDQgt2gNt/E---3.1_32742.p',conj_4) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G_H,v_ts),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbDQgt2gNt/E---3.1_32742.p',conj_0) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X292,X293,X294,X295] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X295,X294,X293)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X295,X292,X294)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X295,X292,X293) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_cut])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_G_H),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,X1)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G_H,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G_H,v_ts),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWW314+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 13:29:01 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.04/1.21 Running first-order model finding
% 1.04/1.21 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbDQgt2gNt/E---3.1_32742.p
% 1.07/1.76 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.07/1.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.07/1.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # new_bool_3 with pid 352 completed with status 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.07/1.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.07/1.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.07/1.76 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.07/1.76 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 356 completed with status 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 1.07/1.76 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.07/1.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.07/1.76 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.07/1.76 # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.07/1.76 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 1.07/1.76 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 1.07/1.76
% 1.07/1.76 # Proof found!
% 1.07/1.76 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.07/1.76 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.07/1.76 # Parsed axioms : 5231
% 1.07/1.76 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4781
% 1.07/1.76 # Initial clauses : 666
% 1.07/1.76 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 31
% 1.07/1.76 # Initial clauses in saturation : 635
% 1.07/1.76 # Processed clauses : 636
% 1.07/1.76 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 1.07/1.76 # ...subsumed : 117
% 1.07/1.76 # ...remaining for further processing : 514
% 1.07/1.76 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 93
% 1.07/1.76 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 1.07/1.76 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 1.07/1.76 # Generated clauses : 10360
% 1.07/1.76 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9137
% 1.07/1.76 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 1.07/1.76 # Paramodulations : 10240
% 1.07/1.76 # Factorizations : 8
% 1.07/1.76 # NegExts : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Equation resolutions : 113
% 1.07/1.76 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Total rewrite steps : 3093
% 1.07/1.76 # ...of those cached : 2153
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.07/1.76 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.07/1.76 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.07/1.76 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.07/1.76 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.07/1.76 # Current number of processed clauses : 481
% 1.07/1.76 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 107
% 1.07/1.76 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 1.07/1.76 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 1.07/1.76 # Non-unit-clauses : 347
% 1.07/1.76 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9134
% 1.07/1.76 # ...number of literals in the above : 25637
% 1.07/1.76 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 1.07/1.76 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20379
% 1.07/1.76 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16356
% 1.07/1.76 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 112
% 1.07/1.76 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 1.07/1.76 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 29
% 1.07/1.76 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1605
% 1.07/1.76 # BW rewrite match successes : 78
% 1.07/1.76 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.07/1.76 # Termbank termtop insertions : 525120
% 1.07/1.76 # Search garbage collected termcells : 54289
% 1.07/1.76
% 1.07/1.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.07/1.76 # User time : 0.312 s
% 1.07/1.76 # System time : 0.030 s
% 1.07/1.76 # Total time : 0.342 s
% 1.07/1.76 # Maximum resident set size: 11188 pages
% 1.07/1.76
% 1.07/1.76 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.07/1.76 # User time : 0.491 s
% 1.07/1.76 # System time : 0.041 s
% 1.07/1.76 # Total time : 0.531 s
% 1.07/1.76 # Maximum resident set size: 9512 pages
% 1.07/1.76 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------