TSTP Solution File: SWW312+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW312+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.90s 2.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_5,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_5) ).
fof(fact_hoare__derivs_Oinsert,axiom,
! [X7,X10,X4,X5] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5)),X10),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5),tc_HOL_Obool))))
=> ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,X7)
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5)),X10),X7)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_hoare__derivs_Oinsert) ).
fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_3) ).
fof(conj_4,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_4) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_5]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X11,X12,X13,X14] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X14,X13,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X14)),X12),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X14),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X14,X13,X11)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X14,X13,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X14)),X12),X11)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_hoare__derivs_Oinsert])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1)),X3),X4))
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1)),X3),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),X1))
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWW312+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 11:20:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.90/2.08 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.90/2.08 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.90/2.08 # Preprocessing time : 0.147 s
% 0.90/2.08
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof found!
% 0.90/2.08 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.90/2.08 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.90/2.08 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.90/2.08 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.90/2.08 # Parsed axioms : 5245
% 0.90/2.08 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5144
% 0.90/2.08 # Initial clauses : 161
% 0.90/2.08 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.90/2.08 # Initial clauses in saturation : 155
% 0.90/2.08 # Processed clauses : 163
% 0.90/2.08 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.90/2.08 # ...subsumed : 37
% 0.90/2.08 # ...remaining for further processing : 124
% 0.90/2.08 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 14
% 0.90/2.08 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Generated clauses : 714
% 0.90/2.08 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 594
% 0.90/2.08 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 8
% 0.90/2.08 # Paramodulations : 696
% 0.90/2.08 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Equation resolutions : 19
% 0.90/2.08 # Current number of processed clauses : 111
% 0.90/2.08 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.90/2.08 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.90/2.08 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.90/2.08 # Non-unit-clauses : 77
% 0.90/2.08 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 586
% 0.90/2.08 # ...number of literals in the above : 1702
% 0.90/2.08 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1786
% 0.90/2.08 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1270
% 0.90/2.08 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 39
% 0.90/2.08 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90
% 0.90/2.08 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # BW rewrite match attempts : 75
% 0.90/2.08 # BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.90/2.08 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.90/2.08 # Termbank termtop insertions : 167467
% 0.90/2.08
% 0.90/2.08 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/2.08 # User time : 0.159 s
% 0.90/2.08 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.90/2.08 # Total time : 0.165 s
% 0.90/2.08 # Maximum resident set size: 13784 pages
% 0.90/24.08 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.10 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------