TSTP Solution File: SWW312+1 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : SWW312+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:11:35 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 3.46s 2.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   27 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (  10   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_hoare__derivs_Oinsert,axiom,
    ! [X7,X10,X4,X5] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5)),X10),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5),tc_HOL_Obool))))
     => ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,X7)
       => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X5,X4,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X5)),X10),X7)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QvSi0qijZO/E---3.1_7343.p',fact_hoare__derivs_Oinsert) ).

fof(fact_singleton__conv2,axiom,
    ! [X6,X5] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X5),hAPP(c_fequal,X6)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X5),X6),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X5,tc_HOL_Obool))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QvSi0qijZO/E---3.1_7343.p',fact_singleton__conv2) ).

fof(conj_5,conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QvSi0qijZO/E---3.1_7343.p',conj_5) ).

fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QvSi0qijZO/E---3.1_7343.p',conj_3) ).

fof(conj_4,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QvSi0qijZO/E---3.1_7343.p',conj_4) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X303,X304,X305,X306] :
      ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X306,X305,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X306)),X304),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X306),tc_HOL_Obool))))
      | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X306,X305,X303)
      | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X306,X305,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X306)),X304),X303)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_hoare__derivs_Oinsert])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1747,X1748] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1748),hAPP(c_fequal,X1747)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1748),X1747),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1748,tc_HOL_Obool))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_singleton__conv2]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_5])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1)),X3),X4))
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1)),X3),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1),tc_HOL_Obool))))
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),hAPP(c_fequal,X2)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1),X2),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1)),X3),X4))
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X1)),hAPP(c_fequal,X3)))
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X4) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(c_fequal,v_t))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),v_ts)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),X1))
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_Ga,v_ts),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SWW312+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.31  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 07:08:08 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.30/1.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 1.30/1.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QvSi0qijZO/E---3.1_7343.p
% 3.46/2.27  # Version: 3.2.0
% 3.46/2.27  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.46/2.27  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # new_bool_1 with pid 7423 completed with status 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 3.46/2.27  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.46/2.27  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.46/2.27  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 3.46/2.27  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 7426 completed with status 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y
% 3.46/2.27  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.46/2.27  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 3.46/2.27  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 3.46/2.27  # Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 3.46/2.27  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 23s (1) cores
% 3.46/2.27  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 3.46/2.27  
% 3.46/2.27  # Proof found!
% 3.46/2.27  # SZS status Theorem
% 3.46/2.27  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.46/2.27  # Parsed axioms                        : 5245
% 3.46/2.27  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4674
% 3.46/2.27  # Initial clauses                      : 822
% 3.46/2.27  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 33
% 3.46/2.27  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 789
% 3.46/2.27  # Processed clauses                    : 829
% 3.46/2.27  # ...of these trivial                  : 12
% 3.46/2.27  # ...subsumed                          : 138
% 3.46/2.27  # ...remaining for further processing  : 679
% 3.46/2.27  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 111
% 3.46/2.27  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 3.46/2.27  # Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 3.46/2.27  # Generated clauses                    : 12602
% 3.46/2.27  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11083
% 3.46/2.27  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 3.46/2.27  # Paramodulations                      : 12459
% 3.46/2.27  # Factorizations                       : 8
% 3.46/2.27  # NegExts                              : 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Equation resolutions                 : 136
% 3.46/2.27  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4181
% 3.46/2.27  # ...of those cached                   : 2980
% 3.46/2.27  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.46/2.27  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.46/2.27  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.46/2.27  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.46/2.27  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.46/2.27  # Current number of processed clauses  : 637
% 3.46/2.27  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 168
% 3.46/2.27  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 3.46/2.27  #    Negative unit clauses             : 24
% 3.46/2.27  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 428
% 3.46/2.27  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11039
% 3.46/2.27  # ...number of literals in the above   : 31104
% 3.46/2.27  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 3.46/2.27  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23875
% 3.46/2.27  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14919
% 3.46/2.27  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 128
% 3.46/2.27  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2001
% 3.46/2.27  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 20
% 3.46/2.27  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3037
% 3.46/2.27  # BW rewrite match successes           : 99
% 3.46/2.27  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.46/2.27  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 601155
% 3.46/2.27  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 54724
% 3.46/2.27  
% 3.46/2.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.46/2.27  # User time                : 0.483 s
% 3.46/2.27  # System time              : 0.021 s
% 3.46/2.27  # Total time               : 0.504 s
% 3.46/2.27  # Maximum resident set size: 11408 pages
% 3.46/2.27  
% 3.46/2.27  # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.46/2.27  # User time                : 0.696 s
% 3.46/2.27  # System time              : 0.036 s
% 3.46/2.27  # Total time               : 0.732 s
% 3.46/2.27  # Maximum resident set size: 9544 pages
% 3.46/2.27  % E---3.1 exiting
% 3.46/2.27  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------