TSTP Solution File: SWW302+1 by PyRes---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SWW302+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:46:06 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 66.75s 66.92s
% Output   : Refutation 66.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem  : SWW302+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.11/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.30  % DateTime : Wed May  8 22:59:08 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 66.75/66.92  % Version:  1.5
% 66.75/66.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 66.75/66.92  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 66.75/66.92  fof(conj_1,conjecture,(![B_Z]:(![B_s]:(v_P(B_Z,B_s)=>(![B_s_H]:((![B_Z_H]:(v_P(B_Z_H,B_s)=>v_Q_H(B_Z_H,B_s_H)))=>v_Q(B_Z,B_s_H)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_1)).
% 66.75/66.92  fof(c480,negated_conjecture,(~(![B_Z]:(![B_s]:(v_P(B_Z,B_s)=>(![B_s_H]:((![B_Z_H]:(v_P(B_Z_H,B_s)=>v_Q_H(B_Z_H,B_s_H)))=>v_Q(B_Z,B_s_H))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1])).
% 66.75/66.92  fof(c481,negated_conjecture,(?[B_Z]:(?[B_s]:(v_P(B_Z,B_s)&(?[B_s_H]:((![B_Z_H]:(~v_P(B_Z_H,B_s)|v_Q_H(B_Z_H,B_s_H)))&~v_Q(B_Z,B_s_H)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c480])).
% 66.75/66.92  fof(c482,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(v_P(X2,X3)&(?[X4]:((![X5]:(~v_P(X5,X3)|v_Q_H(X5,X4)))&~v_Q(X2,X4)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c481])).
% 66.75/66.92  fof(c484,negated_conjecture,(![X5]:(v_P(skolem0001,skolem0002)&((~v_P(X5,skolem0002)|v_Q_H(X5,skolem0003))&~v_Q(skolem0001,skolem0003)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c483,negated_conjecture,(v_P(skolem0001,skolem0002)&((![X5]:(~v_P(X5,skolem0002)|v_Q_H(X5,skolem0003)))&~v_Q(skolem0001,skolem0003))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c482])).])).
% 66.75/66.92  cnf(c487,negated_conjecture,~v_Q(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c484])).
% 66.75/66.92  fof(conj_0,plain,(![B_Z]:(![B_s]:(v_Q_H(B_Z,B_s)=>v_Q(B_Z,B_s)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)).
% 66.75/66.92  fof(c488,plain,(![B_Z]:(![B_s]:(~v_Q_H(B_Z,B_s)|v_Q(B_Z,B_s)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_0])).
% 66.75/66.92  fof(c489,plain,(![X6]:(![X7]:(~v_Q_H(X6,X7)|v_Q(X6,X7)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c488])).
% 66.75/66.92  cnf(c490,plain,~v_Q_H(X19101,X19100)|v_Q(X19101,X19100),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c489])).
% 66.75/66.92  cnf(c485,negated_conjecture,v_P(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c484])).
% 66.75/66.92  cnf(c486,negated_conjecture,~v_P(X19969,skolem0002)|v_Q_H(X19969,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c484])).
% 66.75/66.92  cnf(c26326,plain,v_Q_H(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c486, c485])).
% 66.75/66.92  cnf(c26327,plain,v_Q(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c26326, c490])).
% 66.75/66.92  cnf(c26328,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c26327, c487])).
% 66.75/66.92  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 66.75/66.92  
% 66.75/66.92  % Initial clauses    : 8087
% 66.75/66.92  % Processed clauses  : 619
% 66.75/66.92  % Factors computed   : 135
% 66.75/66.92  % Resolvents computed: 6325
% 66.75/66.92  % Tautologies deleted: 99
% 66.75/66.92  % Forward subsumed   : 80
% 66.75/66.92  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 66.75/66.92  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 66.75/66.92  % User time          : 66.536 s
% 66.75/66.92  % System time        : 0.085 s
% 66.75/66.92  % Total time         : 66.621 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------