TSTP Solution File: SWW300+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW300+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.95s 2.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
! [X282,X283] :
( v_P(X282,X283)
=> ! [X284] :
( ! [X285] :
( v_P_H(X285,X283)
=> v_Q(X285,X284) )
=> v_Q(X282,X284) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
! [X282,X283] :
( v_P(X282,X283)
=> v_P_H(X282,X283) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X282,X283] :
( v_P(X282,X283)
=> ! [X284] :
( ! [X285] :
( v_P_H(X285,X283)
=> v_Q(X285,X284) )
=> v_Q(X282,X284) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X289] :
( v_P(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& ( ~ v_P_H(X289,esk2_0)
| v_Q(X289,esk3_0) )
& ~ v_Q(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ v_Q(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( v_Q(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ v_P_H(X1,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_6,hypothesis,
! [X284,X285] :
( ~ v_P(X284,X285)
| v_P_H(X284,X285) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_0])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ v_P_H(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( v_P_H(X1,X2)
| ~ v_P(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
v_P(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW300+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 16:42:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.95/2.14 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.95/2.14 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.95/2.14 # Preprocessing time : 0.232 s
% 0.95/2.14
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof found!
% 0.95/2.14 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.95/2.14 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.95/2.14 # Parsed axioms : 5242
% 0.95/2.14 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5240
% 0.95/2.14 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.95/2.14 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.95/2.14 # Processed clauses : 5
% 0.95/2.14 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.95/2.14 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1
% 0.95/2.14 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.95/2.14 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.95/2.14 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.95/2.14 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.95/2.14 # Termbank termtop insertions : 130361
% 0.95/2.14
% 0.95/2.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/2.14 # User time : 0.220 s
% 0.95/2.14 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.95/2.14 # Total time : 0.232 s
% 0.95/2.14 # Maximum resident set size: 12764 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------