TSTP Solution File: SWW298+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW298+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.90s 2.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
! [X3] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X3),v_ts))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_n,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
! [X3] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X3),v_ts))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_triple__valid__Suc,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X6,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X5),X4)
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X6,X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_triple__valid__Suc) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X3] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X3),v_ts))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_n,X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
! [X4] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X4),v_ts))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_0])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),esk1_0),v_ts))
& ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_n,esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X9,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X8),X7)
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X9,X8,X7) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_triple__valid__Suc])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),X1),v_ts)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),esk1_0),v_ts)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_n,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWW298+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 00:02:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.90/2.07 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.90/2.07 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.90/2.07 # Preprocessing time : 0.230 s
% 0.90/2.07
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof found!
% 0.90/2.07 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.90/2.07 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.90/2.07 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.90/2.07 # Parsed axioms : 5225
% 0.90/2.07 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5124
% 0.90/2.07 # Initial clauses : 153
% 0.90/2.07 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.90/2.07 # Initial clauses in saturation : 142
% 0.90/2.07 # Processed clauses : 148
% 0.90/2.07 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.90/2.07 # ...subsumed : 40
% 0.90/2.07 # ...remaining for further processing : 102
% 0.90/2.07 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 16
% 0.90/2.07 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.90/2.07 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.90/2.07 # Generated clauses : 682
% 0.90/2.07 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 612
% 0.90/2.07 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.90/2.07 # Paramodulations : 658
% 0.90/2.07 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.90/2.07 # Equation resolutions : 22
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of processed clauses : 90
% 0.90/2.07 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.90/2.07 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.90/2.07 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.90/2.07 # Non-unit-clauses : 67
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 601
% 0.90/2.07 # ...number of literals in the above : 1557
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.90/2.07 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 844
% 0.90/2.07 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 825
% 0.90/2.07 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.90/2.07 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.90/2.07 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # BW rewrite match attempts : 38
% 0.90/2.07 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.90/2.07 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Termbank termtop insertions : 156688
% 0.90/2.07
% 0.90/2.07 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/2.07 # User time : 0.230 s
% 0.90/2.07 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.90/2.07 # Total time : 0.244 s
% 0.90/2.07 # Maximum resident set size: 13536 pages
% 0.90/24.07 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/24.07 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.09 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.10 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.11 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.12 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.13 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.90/24.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/24.15 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------