%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWW296+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:01:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.26s 3.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   9 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (  24 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1911,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1),X2),X3) != X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0zuz44v9/lgb.p',i_0_1911) ).

cnf(i_0_2981,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0zuz44v9/lgb.p',i_0_2981) ).

cnf(i_0_1842,plain,
    hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0zuz44v9/lgb.p',i_0_1842) ).

cnf(c_0_2985,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_List_Olist_OCons(X1),X2),X3) != X3,
    i_0_1911 ).

cnf(c_0_2986,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
    i_0_2981 ).

cnf(c_0_2987,plain,
    hAPP(c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
    i_0_1842 ).

cnf(c_0_2988,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),c_List_Olist_OCons(X4)),X5),X6) != hAPP(X5,X6),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2985,c_0_2986]) ).

cnf(c_0_2989,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat)),X5) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X5),X5),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2986,c_0_2987]) ).

cnf(c_0_2990,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBS(X4,X5,X6),c_List_Olist_OCons(X7))),c_Nat_Osize__class_Osize(tc_Nat_Onat)),X8) != hAPP(X8,X8),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2988,c_0_2989]) ).

cnf(c_0_2991,plain,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_2990]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SWW296+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 03:26:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.12/0.57  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.12/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.12/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.26/3.18  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.26/3.18  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.26/3.18  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.26/3.18  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.26/3.18  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.26/3.18  #
% 8.26/3.18  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 8.26/3.18  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.26/3.18  
% 8.26/3.18  # Proof found!
% 8.26/3.18  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.26/3.18  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.26/3.18  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.26/3.18  
% 8.26/3.18  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.26/3.18  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 8.26/3.18  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 8.26/3.18  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 8.26/3.18  # Maximum resident set size: 9572 pages
% 8.26/3.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------