TSTP Solution File: SWW296+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW296+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.60s 95.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (  30 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(help_c__COMBB__1,axiom,
    ! [X89,X39,X23,X27,X6,X19] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X19,X6,X27),X23),X39),X89) = hAPP(X23,hAPP(X39,X89)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBB__1) ).

fof(help_c__COMBC__1,axiom,
    ! [X89,X39,X23,X6,X27,X19] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X19,X27,X6),X23),X39),X89) = hAPP(hAPP(X23,X89),X39),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBC__1) ).

fof(fact_n__not__Suc__n,axiom,
    ! [X8] : X8 != hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X8),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_n__not__Suc__n) ).

fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
    ! [X89,X39,X23,X6,X27,X19] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X19,X27,X6),X23),X39),X89) = hAPP(hAPP(X23,X89),hAPP(X39,X89)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBS__1) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X90,X91,X92,X93,X94,X95] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X95,X94,X93),X92),X91),X90) = hAPP(X92,hAPP(X91,X90)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBB__1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X90,X91,X92,X93,X94,X95] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X95,X94,X93),X92),X91),X90) = hAPP(hAPP(X92,X90),X91),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBC__1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X9] : X9 != hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X9),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_n__not__Suc__n]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),X5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    X1 != hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),X7)),X8),X9) = hAPP(X7,hAPP(X9,X8)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X90,X91,X92,X93,X94,X95] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X95,X94,X93),X92),X91),X90) = hAPP(hAPP(X92,X90),hAPP(X91,X90)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Nat_OSuc)),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,X7),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBC(X4,X5,X6),hAPP(c_COMBB(X7,X8,X9),c_Nat_OSuc))),X10),X11) != hAPP(hAPP(X10,X11),X11),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SWW296+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 03:36:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.10/24.12  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.12  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.12  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.12  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.26/47.13  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.26/47.14  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.26/47.14  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.26/47.15  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.16  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.16  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.16  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.16  
% 1.58/93.18  eprover: eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.58/93.18  
% 1.58/93.18  
% 1.58/93.20  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.60/95.78  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 1.60/95.78  
% 1.60/95.78  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.60/95.78  # OLD status Res
% 1.60/95.78  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.60/95.78  # Preprocessing time       : 0.280 s
% 1.60/95.78  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 1.60/95.78  
% 1.60/95.78  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.60/95.78  # OLD status Res
% 1.60/95.78  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 1.60/95.78  # Preprocessing time       : 0.167 s
% 1.60/95.78  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_48e494e00e0717ec2eabf59b73b2d711334607de for 23 seconds:
% 1.60/95.78  
% 1.60/95.78  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.60/95.78  # OLD status Res
% 1.60/95.78  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,03,20000,1.0)
% 1.60/95.78  # Preprocessing time       : 1.050 s
% 1.60/95.78  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_33aa8a325940064c53b389b41203bb48a5cb5006 for 23 seconds:
% 1.60/95.78  
% 1.60/95.78  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.60/95.78  # OLD status Res
% 1.60/95.78  # Preprocessing time       : 0.780 s
% 1.60/95.78  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_260890dcdd2d907655d788d68835201aeffdef4a for 23 seconds:
% 1.60/95.78  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.5,,03,100,1.0)
% 1.60/95.78  # Preprocessing time       : 0.671 s
% 1.60/95.78  
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof found!
% 1.60/95.78  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.60/95.78  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object total steps             : 16
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object clause steps            : 8
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object conjectures             : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 1.60/95.78  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.60/95.78  # Parsed axioms                        : 5222
% 1.60/95.78  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5121
% 1.60/95.78  # Initial clauses                      : 164
% 1.60/95.78  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 1.60/95.78  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 156
% 1.60/95.78  # Processed clauses                    : 802
% 1.60/95.78  # ...of these trivial                  : 28
% 1.60/95.78  # ...subsumed                          : 448
% 1.60/95.78  # ...remaining for further processing  : 326
% 1.60/95.78  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 1.60/95.78  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 1.60/95.78  # Backward-rewritten                   : 18
% 1.60/95.78  # Generated clauses                    : 6990
% 1.60/95.78  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 6674
% 1.60/95.78  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 251
% 1.60/95.78  # Paramodulations                      : 6964
% 1.60/95.78  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 1.60/95.78  # Equation resolutions                 : 21
% 1.60/95.78  # Current number of processed clauses  : 297
% 1.60/95.78  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 1.60/95.78  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 20
% 1.60/95.78  #    Negative unit clauses             : 34
% 1.60/95.78  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 204
% 1.60/95.78  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5867
% 1.60/95.78  # ...number of literals in the above   : 11568
% 1.60/95.78  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 1.60/95.78  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34319
% 1.60/95.78  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16881
% 1.60/95.78  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 443
% 1.60/95.78  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 916
% 1.60/95.78  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 2943
% 1.60/95.78  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4386
% 1.60/95.78  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1495
% 1.60/95.78  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.60/95.78  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 391966
% 1.60/95.78  
% 1.60/95.78  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.60/95.78  # User time                : 2.438 s
% 1.60/95.78  # System time              : 0.039 s
% 1.60/95.78  # Total time               : 2.477 s
% 1.60/95.78  # Maximum resident set size: 57340 pages
% 1.60/116.20  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.60/116.20  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.60/116.21  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.60/116.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.22  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.22  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/116.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.60/116.25  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------