TSTP Solution File: SWW295+1 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWW295+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:23:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    ( v_P(sK493,sK494)
    | sP106 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ( c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),sK494,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),sK495)
    | sP106 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( ~ v_Q(sK493,sK495)
    | sP106 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( v_P(sK496,sK497)
    | ~ sP106 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( c_Natural_Oevaln(hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)),sK497,v_n,sK498)
    | ~ sP106 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ v_Q(sK496,sK498)
    | ~ sP106 ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),sK494,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),sK495)
    | c_Natural_Oevaln(hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)),sK494,v_n,sK495) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_evaln_Oequations_I9_J)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)),sK497,v_n,sK498)
    | c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),sK497,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),sK498) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_evaln_Oequations_I9_J)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    ( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)),sK497,v_n,sK498)
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),sK497,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),sK498)
    | ~ v_P(sK496,sK497)
    | ~ v_P(sK496,sK497)
    | v_Q(sK496,sK498)
    | v_Q(sK496,sK498) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    ( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)),sK494,v_n,sK495)
    | ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_pn),sK494,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_n),sK495)
    | ~ v_P(sK493,sK494)
    | ~ v_P(sK493,sK494)
    | v_Q(sK493,sK495)
    | v_Q(sK493,sK495) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWW295+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 06:33:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.52  % symbols: 1126
% 0.19/0.52  % clauses: 8383
% 0.19/0.52  % start clauses: 4
% 0.19/0.52  % iterative deepening steps: 45
% 0.19/0.52  % maximum path limit: 1
% 0.19/0.52  % literal attempts: 1748
% 0.19/0.52  % depth failures: 1422
% 0.19/0.52  % regularity failures: 0
% 0.19/0.52  % tautology failures: 0
% 0.19/0.52  % reductions: 13
% 0.19/0.52  % extensions: 1583
% 0.19/0.52  % SAT variables: 1303
% 0.19/0.52  % SAT clauses: 1093
% 0.19/0.52  % WalkSAT solutions: 1085
% 0.19/0.52  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------