TSTP Solution File: SWW277+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SWW277+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:23:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : Proof 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
class_Fields_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Fields_Ofield)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ class_Fields_Ofield(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)
| class_Divides_Osemiring__div(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Polynomial__Opoly__Divides_Osemiring__div)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Rings_Odvd__class_Odvd(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),v_s____)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact__096_091_058_N_Aa_M_A1_058_093_Advd_As_096)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ sPE(v_s____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_s____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))))))
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ sPE(hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_s____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))))),v_s____)
| sPE(v_s____,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_s____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Rings_Odvd__class_Odvd(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),v_s____))
| ~ class_Divides_Osemiring__div(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
| sPE(hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),c_Divides_Odiv__class_Odiv(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_s____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))))),v_s____) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_dvd__mult__div__cancel)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWW277+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 16:46:36 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.46 % symbols: 167
% 0.17/0.46 % clauses: 1776
% 0.17/0.46 % start clauses: 1
% 0.17/0.46 % iterative deepening steps: 148
% 0.17/0.46 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.17/0.46 % literal attempts: 78004
% 0.17/0.46 % depth failures: 69668
% 0.17/0.46 % regularity failures: 2380
% 0.17/0.46 % tautology failures: 173
% 0.17/0.46 % reductions: 4348
% 0.17/0.46 % extensions: 73656
% 0.17/0.46 % SAT variables: 31823
% 0.17/0.46 % SAT clauses: 31368
% 0.17/0.46 % WalkSAT solutions: 31366
% 0.17/0.46 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------