TSTP Solution File: SWW277+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW277+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.67s 50.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 25 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 15 ~; 10 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 3 sgn 15 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
fof(fact_one__poly__def,axiom,
! [X4] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X4)
=> c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4)) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(X4,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X4),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_one__poly__def) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
( ? [X94] : v_s____ = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),X94)
=> v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_synthetic__div__correct_H,axiom,
! [X11,X15,X4] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__ring__1(X4)
=> c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X4,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X4,X15),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X4,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X4),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4))))),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X4,X11,X15)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X4,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X4,X11),X15),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4)))) = X11 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_synthetic__div__correct_H) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
fof(fact_pCons__0__0,axiom,
! [X4] :
( class_Groups_Ozero(X4)
=> c_Polynomial_OpCons(X4,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X4),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_pCons__0__0) ).
fof(fact_add__poly__code_I2_J,axiom,
! [X11,X4] :
( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X4)
=> c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4),X11,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X4))) = X11 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_add__poly__code_I2_J) ).
fof(fact_xa,axiom,
v_x____ = v_a____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_xa) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__ring__1,axiom,
class_Rings_Ocomm__ring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__ring__1) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ozero,axiom,
class_Groups_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ozero) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add,axiom,
class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add) ).
fof(fact_h,axiom,
hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_s____),v_x____) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_h) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X5] :
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X5)
| c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X5),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_one__poly__def])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,hypothesis,
! [X95] :
( v_s____ != hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),X95)
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_0])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18] :
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__ring__1(X18)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X18),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X18)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X18,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X18,X17),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X18,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X18),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X18))))),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X18,X16,X17)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X18,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X18,X16),X17),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X18)))) = X16 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_synthetic__div__correct_H])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X5] :
( ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X5)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X5),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_pCons__0__0])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X12,X13] :
( ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X13)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X13),X12,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X13))) = X12 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_add__poly__code_I2_J])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
( v_thesis____
| v_s____ != hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_a____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
v_x____ = v_a____,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_xa]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(X1,X2),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))))),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X1,X3,X2)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,X3),X2),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)))) = X3
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__ring__1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__ring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__ring__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
class_Groups_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ozero]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = X2
| ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_x____),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))))),X1) != v_s____,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))),c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X2,X1)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X2),X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_s____),v_x____) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_h]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_x____),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))),X1) != v_s____,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SWW277+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 16:51:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.50/23.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/23.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/23.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.50/23.56 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/46.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/46.56 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/46.56 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.64/46.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.67/50.86 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.67/50.86
% 0.67/50.86 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.67/50.86 # OLD status Res
% 0.67/50.86 # Preprocessing time : 0.123 s
% 0.67/50.86 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 0.67/50.86
% 0.67/50.86 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.67/50.86 # OLD status Res
% 0.67/50.86 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 0.67/50.86 # Preprocessing time : 0.044 s
% 0.67/50.86 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 0.67/50.86 # Preprocessing time : 0.072 s
% 0.67/50.86
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof found!
% 0.67/50.86 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.67/50.86 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object total steps : 38
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object formula steps : 19
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object initial formulas used : 12
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.67/50.86 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.67/50.86 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.67/50.86 # Parsed axioms : 1209
% 0.67/50.86 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.67/50.86 # Initial clauses : 1698
% 0.67/50.86 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 78
% 0.67/50.86 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1620
% 0.67/50.86 # Processed clauses : 8247
% 0.67/50.86 # ...of these trivial : 243
% 0.67/50.86 # ...subsumed : 4118
% 0.67/50.86 # ...remaining for further processing : 3886
% 0.67/50.86 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2080
% 0.67/50.86 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 65401
% 0.67/50.86 # Backward-subsumed : 69
% 0.67/50.86 # Backward-rewritten : 250
% 0.67/50.86 # Generated clauses : 224228
% 0.67/50.86 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 211531
% 0.67/50.86 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 969
% 0.67/50.86 # Paramodulations : 221876
% 0.67/50.86 # Factorizations : 22
% 0.67/50.86 # Equation resolutions : 2325
% 0.67/50.86 # Current number of processed clauses : 3521
% 0.67/50.86 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 801
% 0.67/50.86 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 150
% 0.67/50.86 # Negative unit clauses : 95
% 0.67/50.86 # Non-unit-clauses : 2475
% 0.67/50.86 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 122614
% 0.67/50.86 # ...number of literals in the above : 335738
% 0.67/50.86 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.67/50.86 # Current number of archived clauses : 325
% 0.67/50.86 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 658241
% 0.67/50.86 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 490583
% 0.67/50.86 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3957
% 0.67/50.86 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70053
% 0.67/50.86 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 436
% 0.67/50.86 # BW rewrite match attempts : 24652
% 0.67/50.86 # BW rewrite match successes : 1044
% 0.67/50.86 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.67/50.86 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.67/50.86 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6147508
% 0.67/50.86
% 0.67/50.86 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/50.86 # User time : 3.677 s
% 0.67/50.86 # System time : 0.102 s
% 0.67/50.86 # Total time : 3.779 s
% 0.67/50.86 # Maximum resident set size: 137348 pages
% 0.70/69.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.70/69.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.70/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.61 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.70/69.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.62 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.62 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.63 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.63 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.70/69.63 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/69.63 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------