TSTP Solution File: SWW246+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWW246+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:01:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.81s 2.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   23 (   4 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_259,plain,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Oidom(t_a)
    | ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(t_a,t_a,c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gfghdpwt/lgb.p',i_0_259) ).

cnf(i_0_1588,hypothesis,
    class_Rings_Oidom(t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gfghdpwt/lgb.p',i_0_1588) ).

cnf(i_0_319,plain,
    ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(X1,X2,X3)
    | hAPP(X3,esk2_1(X3)) != hAPP(X3,esk3_1(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gfghdpwt/lgb.p',i_0_319) ).

cnf(i_0_1204,plain,
    ( hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))),X2) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
    | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gfghdpwt/lgb.p',i_0_1204) ).

cnf(i_0_176,plain,
    ( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-gfghdpwt/lgb.p',i_0_176) ).

cnf(c_0_1594,plain,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Oidom(t_a)
    | ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(t_a,t_a,c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))) ),
    i_0_259 ).

cnf(c_0_1595,hypothesis,
    class_Rings_Oidom(t_a),
    i_0_1588 ).

cnf(c_0_1596,plain,
    ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(X1,X2,X3)
    | hAPP(X3,esk2_1(X3)) != hAPP(X3,esk3_1(X3)) ),
    i_0_319 ).

cnf(c_0_1597,plain,
    ( hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))),X2) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
    | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
    i_0_1204 ).

cnf(c_0_1598,plain,
    ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(t_a,t_a,c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1594,c_0_1595])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1599,plain,
    ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(X1,X2,c_Polynomial_Opoly(X3,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X3))))
    | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1596,c_0_1597]),c_0_1597]) ).

cnf(c_0_1600,plain,
    ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1598,c_0_1599]) ).

cnf(c_0_1601,plain,
    ( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X1) ),
    i_0_176 ).

cnf(c_0_1602,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1600,c_0_1601]),c_0_1595])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SWW246+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 20:36:36 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.56  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.56  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.56  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.56  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.81/2.98  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.81/2.98  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.81/2.98  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.81/2.98  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.81/2.98  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.81/2.98  #
% 8.81/2.98  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 8.81/2.98  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.81/2.98  
% 8.81/2.98  # Proof found!
% 8.81/2.98  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.81/2.98  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.81/2.98  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.81/2.98  
% 8.81/2.98  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.81/2.98  # User time                : 0.033 s
% 8.81/2.98  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 8.81/2.98  # Total time               : 0.041 s
% 8.81/2.98  # Maximum resident set size: 7404 pages
% 8.81/2.98  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------