TSTP Solution File: SWW246+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW246+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 2.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (  20   ~;  15   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   6 sgn  19   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact__C0_C,axiom,
    ( class_Rings_Oidom(t_a)
   => ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(t_a,t_a,c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact__C0_C) ).

fof(tfree_0,hypothesis,
    class_Rings_Oidom(t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',tfree_0) ).

fof(fact_constant__def,axiom,
    ! [X2,X15,X5] :
      ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(X5,X15,X2)
    <=> ! [X3,X16] : hAPP(X2,X3) = hAPP(X2,X16) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_constant__def) ).

fof(fact_order__root,axiom,
    ! [X11,X4,X5] :
      ( class_Rings_Oidom(X5)
     => ( hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X5,X4),X11) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X5)
      <=> ( X4 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5))
          | c_Polynomial_Oorder(X5,X11,X4) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_order__root) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Oidom(t_a)
    | ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(t_a,t_a,c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact__C0_C])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(t_a,t_a,c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))))
    | ~ class_Rings_Oidom(t_a) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    class_Rings_Oidom(t_a),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[tfree_0]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X17,X18,X19] :
      ( ( ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(X19,X18,X17)
        | hAPP(X17,X20) = hAPP(X17,X21) )
      & ( hAPP(X17,esk2_1(X17)) != hAPP(X17,esk3_1(X17))
        | c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(X19,X18,X17) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_constant__def])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ~ c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(t_a,t_a,c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Oconstant(X1,X2,X3)
    | hAPP(X3,esk2_1(X3)) != hAPP(X3,esk3_1(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X14,X13),X12) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X14)
        | X13 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X14))
        | c_Polynomial_Oorder(X14,X12,X13) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)
        | ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X14) )
      & ( X13 != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X14))
        | hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X14,X13),X12) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X14)
        | ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X14) )
      & ( c_Polynomial_Oorder(X14,X12,X13) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)
        | hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X14,X13),X12) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X14)
        | ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X14) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_order__root])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),esk2_1(c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))))) != hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),esk3_1(c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,X2),X3) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)
    | ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X1)
    | X2 != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),esk3_1(c_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))))) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWW246+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 20:48:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/2.55  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.37/2.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.108 s
% 0.37/2.55  
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof found!
% 0.37/2.55  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/2.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object total steps             : 15
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object clause steps            : 8
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object conjectures             : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.37/2.55  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
% 0.37/2.55  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.37/2.55  # Parsed axioms                        : 1199
% 0.37/2.55  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Initial clauses                      : 1592
% 0.37/2.55  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 85
% 0.37/2.55  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1507
% 0.37/2.55  # Processed clauses                    : 1656
% 0.37/2.55  # ...of these trivial                  : 39
% 0.37/2.55  # ...subsumed                          : 281
% 0.37/2.55  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1336
% 0.37/2.55  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 229
% 0.37/2.55  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.37/2.55  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.37/2.55  # Generated clauses                    : 82777
% 0.37/2.55  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 77928
% 0.37/2.55  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 25
% 0.37/2.55  # Paramodulations                      : 82481
% 0.37/2.55  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.37/2.55  # Equation resolutions                 : 287
% 0.37/2.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1299
% 0.37/2.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 202
% 0.37/2.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 14
% 0.37/2.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 18
% 0.37/2.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1065
% 0.37/2.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 77658
% 0.37/2.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 283234
% 0.37/2.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.37/2.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 213297
% 0.37/2.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 113181
% 0.37/2.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 208
% 0.37/2.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 777
% 0.37/2.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 892
% 0.37/2.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 540
% 0.37/2.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 173
% 0.37/2.55  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.37/2.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2352119
% 0.37/2.55  
% 0.37/2.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/2.55  # User time                : 1.047 s
% 0.37/2.55  # System time              : 0.044 s
% 0.37/2.55  # Total time               : 1.091 s
% 0.37/2.55  # Maximum resident set size: 84988 pages
% 0.37/23.53  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/23.54  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/23.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.59  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.37/23.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.60  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.60  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.61  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.61  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.37/23.61  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/23.61  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------