TSTP Solution File: SWW237+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SWW237+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:01:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.67s 3.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (   0 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1347,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Opreorder(X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_1347) ).

cnf(i_0_290,hypothesis,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_mzh,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_mazh,v_ma)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_290) ).

cnf(i_0_249,plain,
    class_Orderings_Opreorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_249) ).

cnf(i_0_407,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Groups_Oordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,X4),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_407) ).

cnf(i_0_239,plain,
    class_Groups_Oordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_239) ).

cnf(i_0_291,hypothesis,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____),v_ma),v_mzh),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_291) ).

cnf(i_0_326,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Groups_Oordered__ab__group__add__abs(X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(X1,X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_326) ).

cnf(i_0_236,plain,
    class_Groups_Oordered__ab__group__add__abs(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_236) ).

cnf(i_0_292,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,v_mazh),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-trllt9r_/lgb.p',i_0_292) ).

cnf(c_0_1357,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Opreorder(X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X4) ),
    i_0_1347 ).

cnf(c_0_1358,hypothesis,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_mzh,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_mazh,v_ma)),
    i_0_290 ).

cnf(c_0_1359,plain,
    class_Orderings_Opreorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    i_0_249 ).

cnf(c_0_1360,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Groups_Oordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,X4),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X3,X4)) ),
    i_0_407 ).

cnf(c_0_1361,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_mazh,v_ma))
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,v_mzh) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1357,c_0_1358]),c_0_1359])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1362,plain,
    class_Groups_Oordered__ab__semigroup__add__imp__le(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    i_0_239 ).

cnf(c_0_1363,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,v_mazh)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,v_ma),v_mzh) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1360,c_0_1361]),c_0_1362])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1364,hypothesis,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____),v_ma),v_mzh),
    i_0_291 ).

cnf(c_0_1365,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Groups_Oordered__ab__group__add__abs(X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(X1,X2),X3) ),
    i_0_326 ).

cnf(c_0_1366,hypothesis,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____),v_mazh),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1363,c_0_1364]) ).

cnf(c_0_1367,plain,
    class_Groups_Oordered__ab__group__add__abs(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    i_0_236 ).

cnf(c_0_1368,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,v_mazh),
    i_0_292 ).

cnf(c_0_1369,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1365,c_0_1366]),c_0_1367])]),c_0_1368]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SWW237+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 10:25:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.51  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.51  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.51  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.67/3.05  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.67/3.05  # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.67/3.05  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.67/3.05  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 9.67/3.05  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 9.67/3.05  #
% 9.67/3.05  # Preprocessing time       : 0.040 s
% 9.67/3.05  
% 9.67/3.05  # Proof found!
% 9.67/3.05  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.67/3.05  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.67/3.05  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.67/3.05  
% 9.67/3.05  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.67/3.05  # User time                : 0.087 s
% 9.67/3.05  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 9.67/3.05  # Total time               : 0.100 s
% 9.67/3.05  # Maximum resident set size: 7400 pages
% 9.67/3.05  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------