TSTP Solution File: SWW219+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWW219+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:28:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.20s 1.39s
% Output   : Refutation 1.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('SWW219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(361,axiom,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(skc7,u)),v_r),
    file('SWW219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(1413,axiom,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v),hAPP(skc7,u))),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_s____),c_Rings_Oinverse__class_Odivide(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(u))))),
    file('SWW219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(1723,axiom,
    ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(u,skf155(u))),v_r)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v),hAPP(u,skf156(u)))),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_s____),c_Rings_Oinverse__class_Odivide(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(skf156(u))))))
    | v_thesis____ ),
    file('SWW219+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(1868,plain,
    ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(u,skf155(u))),v_r)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v),hAPP(u,skf156(u)))),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ouminus__class_Ouminus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_s____),c_Rings_Oinverse__class_Odivide(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(skf156(u)))))) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1723,1]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:1723.2,1.0')] ).

cnf(1871,plain,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(skc7,skf155(skc7))),v_r),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1413,1868]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1413.0,1868.1')] ).

cnf(1872,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1871,361]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:1871.0,361.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SWW219+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 22:13:49 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.20/1.39  
% 1.20/1.39  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.20/1.39  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.20/1.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.20/1.39  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.20/1.39  SPASS derived 11 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1514 clauses.
% 1.20/1.39  SPASS allocated 106202 KBytes.
% 1.20/1.39  SPASS spent	0:00:01.04 on the problem.
% 1.20/1.39  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.20/1.39  		0:00:00.49 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.20/1.39  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 1.20/1.39  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.20/1.39  		0:00:00.36 for the reduction.
% 1.20/1.39  
% 1.20/1.39  
% 1.20/1.39  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 :
% 1.20/1.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.20/1.39  Formulae used in the proof : conj_1 fact__096EX_Af_O_AALL_Ax_O_Acmod_A_If_Ax_J_A_060_061_Ar_A_G_Acmod_A_Ipoly_Ap_A_If_Ax_J_J_A_060_A_N_As_A_L_A1_A_P_Areal_A_ISuc_Ax_J_096 conj_0
% 1.20/1.39  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------