TSTP Solution File: SWW215+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW215+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.28s 1.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  17   ~;  19   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   2 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_less__eq__real__def,axiom,
    ! [X21,X17] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X17,X21)
    <=> ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X17,X21)
        | X17 = X21 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_less__eq__real__def) ).

fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_real__le__trans,axiom,
    ! [X14,X15,X16] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X16,X15)
     => ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X15,X14)
       => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X16,X14) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__le__trans) ).

fof(fact_H_I5_J,axiom,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),v_da____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_H_I5_J) ).

fof(fact_real__le__linear,axiom,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X13,X12)
      | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X12,X13) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__le__linear) ).

fof(fact_real__le__antisym,axiom,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X13,X12)
     => ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X12,X13)
       => X13 = X12 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__le__antisym) ).

fof(fact_H_I2_J,axiom,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_H_I2_J) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X22,X23] :
      ( ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X23,X22)
        | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X23,X22)
        | X23 = X22 )
      & ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X23,X22)
        | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X23,X22) )
      & ( X23 != X22
        | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X23,X22) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_less__eq__real__def])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19] :
      ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X19,X18)
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X18,X17)
      | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X19,X17) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__trans])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),v_da____),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_H_I5_J]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X14,X15] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X15,X14)
      | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X14,X15) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__linear]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X14,X15] :
      ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X15,X14)
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X14,X15)
      | X15 = X14 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__antisym])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_H_I2_J]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X3,X2)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),v_da____),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2)
    | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2,X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,v_da____)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( v_da____ = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_da____) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_da____),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    v_da____ = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_26]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SWW215+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.30  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 02:11:34 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.28/1.46  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.46  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.28/1.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.048 s
% 0.28/1.46  
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object total steps             : 28
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object clause steps            : 15
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.28/1.46  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.28/1.46  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 1278
% 0.28/1.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 972
% 0.28/1.46  # Initial clauses                      : 422
% 0.28/1.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 32
% 0.28/1.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 390
% 0.28/1.46  # Processed clauses                    : 432
% 0.28/1.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.28/1.46  # ...subsumed                          : 79
% 0.28/1.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 350
% 0.28/1.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 25
% 0.28/1.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.28/1.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.28/1.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.28/1.46  # Generated clauses                    : 2625
% 0.28/1.46  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2167
% 0.28/1.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 15
% 0.28/1.46  # Paramodulations                      : 2568
% 0.28/1.46  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.28/1.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 51
% 0.28/1.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 319
% 0.28/1.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 61
% 0.28/1.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 0.28/1.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 10
% 0.28/1.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 243
% 0.28/1.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2028
% 0.28/1.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 4301
% 0.28/1.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.28/1.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.28/1.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9298
% 0.28/1.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8690
% 0.28/1.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 82
% 0.28/1.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 207
% 0.28/1.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.28/1.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 301
% 0.28/1.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 55
% 0.28/1.46  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.28/1.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.28/1.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 97057
% 0.28/1.46  
% 0.28/1.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.46  # User time                : 0.079 s
% 0.28/1.46  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.28/1.46  # Total time               : 0.086 s
% 0.28/1.46  # Maximum resident set size: 7604 pages
% 0.28/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.28/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.28/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------