TSTP Solution File: SWW213+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWW213+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:24:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 26.24s 26.43s
% Output   : Refutation 26.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (  10 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X)
    | hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X,Y,Z)),U) = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X,Y),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X,Z,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_poly__offset__poly) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X)
    | c_Polynomial_Odegree(X,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X,Y,Z)) = c_Polynomial_Odegree(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_degree__offset__poly) ).

cnf(1347,axiom,
    class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).

cnf(1427,hypothesis,
    ( c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X) != c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_p)
    | hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X),'SKOLEMAAAV24'(X)) != hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_p),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_z,'SKOLEMAAAV24'(X)))
    | v_thesis____ ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

cnf(1428,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

cnf(1429,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X) != c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_p)
    | hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X),'SKOLEMAAAV24'(X)) != hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_p),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_z,'SKOLEMAAAV24'(X))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1427,1428]) ).

cnf(1990,plain,
    c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X,Y)) = c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,1347]) ).

cnf(5287,plain,
    hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X,Y)),Z) = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,Y,Z)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,1347]) ).

cnf(5288,plain,
    ( c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X) != c_Polynomial_Odegree(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_p)
    | hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X),'SKOLEMAAAV24'(X)) != hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_p,v_z)),'SKOLEMAAAV24'(X)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1429,5287,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7986,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5288,theory(equality)]),1990,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWW213+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 02:01:18 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.49  * 
% 0.22/0.50  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.50  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.50  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.50   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.50   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.50   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.50   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.50   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.50   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.50   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.50   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.50   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.50   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.50   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.50  "."
% 0.22/0.50  * 
% 0.22/0.50  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-06T02:01:19
% 0.22/0.50  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-06-06T02:01:19
% 0.57/0.74  
% 0.57/0.75  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_Nat_Onat| ?X ?X).
% 0.57/0.76  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_RealDef_Oreal| ?X ?X).
% 0.57/0.76  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Rings_Odvd__class_Odvd| |tc_Nat_Onat| ?X ?X).
% 0.57/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.57/0.77     |class_Lattices_Oab__semigroup__idem__mult| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.57/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.57/0.77     |c_Groups_Osemigroup| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.57/0.77  WARNING:
% 0.57/0.77     |class_Groups_Oone| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 26.24/26.43  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_Int_Oint| ?X ?X).
% 26.24/26.43  
% 26.24/26.43  #||
% 26.24/26.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 26.24/26.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 26.24/26.43  ||#
% 26.24/26.43  
% 26.24/26.43  ; Summary of computation:
% 26.24/26.43  ;    272851 formulas have been input or derived (from 1131 formulas).
% 26.24/26.43  ;      7986 ( 3%) were retained.  Of these,
% 26.24/26.43  ;          229 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 26.24/26.43  ;         7757 (97%) are still being kept.
% 26.24/26.43  ; 
% 26.24/26.43  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.224   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.031   0%   Assert                       (1,264 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     1.276   5%   Process new row              (261,955 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     4.528  17%   Resolution                   (2,260 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.061   0%   Paramodulation               (1,130 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (12 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.219   1%   Condensing                   (15,973 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     1.118   4%   Forward subsumption          (15,973 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.196   1%   Backward subsumption         (3,480 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.246   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (30,532 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;    12.435  48%   Forward simplification       (261,946 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.152   1%   Backward simplification      (7,963 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     4.632  18%   Ordering                     (1,197,786 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.003   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 26.24/26.43  ;     0.804   3%   Other
% 26.24/26.43  ;    25.925        Total
% 26.24/26.43  ;    25.931        Real time
% 26.24/26.43  ; 
% 26.24/26.44  ; Term-hash-array has 19,975 terms in all.
% 26.24/26.44  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,399 entries (3,399 at peak, 3,480 added, 81 deleted).
% 26.24/26.44  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 21,591 nodes (21,591 at peak, 22,226 added, 635 deleted).
% 26.24/26.44  ;  Retrieved 45,357 possibly forward subsuming rows in 15,973 calls.
% 26.24/26.44  ;  Retrieved 2,777 possibly backward subsumed rows in 3,480 calls.
% 26.24/26.44  ; Path-index has 19,624 entries (19,624 at peak, 20,037 added, 413 deleted).
% 26.24/26.44  ; Path-index has 21,531 nodes (21,531 at peak, 21,793 added, 262 deleted).
% 26.24/26.44  ; Trie-index has 19,624 entries (19,624 at peak, 20,037 added, 413 deleted).
% 26.24/26.44  ; Trie-index has 119,676 nodes (119,676 at peak, 121,418 added, 1,742 deleted).
% 26.24/26.44  ; Retrieved 2,048,301 generalization terms in 3,272,312 calls.
% 26.24/26.44  ; Retrieved 11,951 instance terms in 7,445 calls.
% 26.24/26.44  ; Retrieved 6,324,982 unifiable terms in 53,977 calls.
% 26.24/26.44  ; 
% 26.24/26.44  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 26.24/26.44  ;     1 with value 21              1 with value 41
% 26.24/26.44  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 250 entries:
% 26.24/26.44  ;    29 with value 30              9 with value 39               2 with value 48
% 26.24/26.44  ;    47 with value 31              6 with value 40               1 with value 51
% 26.24/26.44  ;    24 with value 32              4 with value 41               2 with value 54
% 26.24/26.44  ;    43 with value 33              1 with value 42               6 with value 57
% 26.24/26.44  ;     6 with value 34              2 with value 43               2 with value 58
% 26.24/26.44  ;    15 with value 35              1 with value 44               3 with value 62
% 26.24/26.44  ;     8 with value 36             12 with value 45               3 with value 65
% 26.24/26.44  ;     8 with value 37              1 with value 46               2 with value 71
% 26.24/26.44  ;     6 with value 38              7 with value 47
% 26.24/26.44  ; The agenda of rows to give has 6376 entries:
% 26.24/26.44  ;     1 with value (4 4)         155 with value (4 27)         137 with value (4 48)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   171 with value (4 6)         180 with value (4 28)          63 with value (4 49)
% 26.24/26.44  ;    19 with value (4 7)         180 with value (4 29)          56 with value (4 50)
% 26.24/26.44  ;    13 with value (4 8)         122 with value (4 30)          37 with value (4 51)
% 26.24/26.44  ;    26 with value (4 9)         140 with value (4 31)          55 with value (4 52)
% 26.24/26.44  ;    20 with value (4 10)         97 with value (4 32)          54 with value (4 53)
% 26.24/26.44  ;    52 with value (4 11)         77 with value (4 33)          12 with value (4 54)
% 26.24/26.44  ;    56 with value (4 12)         77 with value (4 34)          10 with value (4 55)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   146 with value (4 13)        189 with value (4 35)          56 with value (4 56)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   105 with value (4 14)         98 with value (4 36)          48 with value (4 57)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   187 with value (4 15)        151 with value (4 37)         113 with value (4 58)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   124 with value (4 16)         53 with value (4 38)         153 with value (4 59)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   193 with value (4 17)        119 with value (4 39)          66 with value (4 60)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   149 with value (4 18)        125 with value (4 40)          38 with value (4 61)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   212 with value (4 19)        126 with value (4 41)          12 with value (4 62)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   197 with value (4 20)        108 with value (4 42)           4 with value (4 63)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   144 with value (4 21)         52 with value (4 43)           4 with value (4 64)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   202 with value (4 22)         43 with value (4 44)         130 with value (4 67)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   229 with value (4 23)         79 with value (4 45)           6 with value (4 68)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   228 with value (4 24)         89 with value (4 46)           6 with value (4 71)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   230 with value (4 25)         82 with value (4 47)           4 with value (4 74)
% 26.24/26.44  ;   266 with value (4 26)
% 26.24/26.44  Evaluation took:
% 26.24/26.44    25.934 seconds of real time
% 26.24/26.44    23.541214 seconds of user run time
% 26.24/26.44    2.388795 seconds of system run time
% 26.24/26.44    [Run times include 2.433 seconds GC run time.]
% 26.24/26.44    0 calls to %EVAL
% 26.24/26.44    0 page faults and
% 26.24/26.44    2,073,093,232 bytes consed.
% 26.24/26.44  :PROOF-FOUND
% 26.24/26.44  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-06T02:01:45
% 26.24/26.44  :PROOF-FOUND
% 26.24/26.44  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------