TSTP Solution File: SWW204+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 1.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  13   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   1 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_real__le__linear,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X8),X7))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X7),X8)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_real__le__linear) ).

fof(fact_real__le__antisym,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X8),X7))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X7),X8))
       => X8 = X7 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_real__le__antisym) ).

fof(fact_real__le__trans,axiom,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X11),X10))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X10),X9))
       => hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X11),X9)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_real__le__trans) ).

fof(fact__0960_A_060_061_Acmod_A_Is_A0_J_096,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact__0960_A_060_061_Acmod_A_Is_A0_J_096) ).

fof(fact_assms,axiom,
    ! [X6] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,X6))),v_r)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_assms) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X10),X9))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X9),X10)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__linear]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X10),X9))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X9),X10))
      | X10 = X9 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__antisym])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X14),X13))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X13),X12))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X14),X12)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__trans])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X2))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2),X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2),X1))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact__0960_A_060_061_Acmod_A_Is_A0_J_096]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X2))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X3),X2))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_r),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X7] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,X7))),v_r)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_assms]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)))),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),v_r)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,X1))),v_r)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SWW204+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 10:40:37 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/1.56  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.37/1.56  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.37/1.56  # Preprocessing time       : 0.065 s
% 0.37/1.56  
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof found!
% 0.37/1.56  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/1.56  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object total steps             : 23
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object formula steps           : 12
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.37/1.56  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.37/1.56  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.37/1.56  # Parsed axioms                        : 1264
% 0.37/1.56  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1163
% 0.37/1.56  # Initial clauses                      : 155
% 0.37/1.56  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 13
% 0.37/1.56  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 142
% 0.37/1.56  # Processed clauses                    : 158
% 0.37/1.56  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.37/1.56  # ...subsumed                          : 33
% 0.37/1.56  # ...remaining for further processing  : 122
% 0.37/1.56  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 0.37/1.56  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.37/1.56  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.37/1.56  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.37/1.56  # Generated clauses                    : 748
% 0.37/1.56  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 606
% 0.37/1.56  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.37/1.56  # Paramodulations                      : 723
% 0.37/1.56  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.37/1.56  # Equation resolutions                 : 19
% 0.37/1.56  # Current number of processed clauses  : 107
% 0.37/1.56  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
% 0.37/1.56  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.37/1.56  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.37/1.56  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 75
% 0.37/1.56  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 587
% 0.37/1.56  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1382
% 0.37/1.56  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.37/1.56  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.37/1.56  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 569
% 0.37/1.56  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 549
% 0.37/1.56  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 29
% 0.37/1.56  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34
% 0.37/1.56  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.37/1.56  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 92
% 0.37/1.56  # BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 0.37/1.56  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.37/1.56  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.37/1.56  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 49964
% 0.37/1.56  
% 0.37/1.56  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/1.56  # User time                : 0.078 s
% 0.37/1.56  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.37/1.56  # Total time               : 0.087 s
% 0.37/1.56  # Maximum resident set size: 5812 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------