TSTP Solution File: SWW198+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SWW198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:28:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.99s 1.16s
% Output : Refutation 0.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 2 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(189,axiom,
~ c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,v_na____),
file('SWW198+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(256,axiom,
equal(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),
file('SWW198+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(371,axiom,
equal(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)))),
file('SWW198+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(584,axiom,
~ equal(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),u)),v_na____),
file('SWW198+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(755,axiom,
( c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,u)
| equal(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))),skf18(u))),u) ),
file('SWW198+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(1767,plain,
equal(c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[256,371]),
[iquote('0:Rew:256.0,371.0')] ).
cnf(1798,plain,
~ equal(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),u)),v_na____),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1767,584]),
[iquote('0:Rew:1767.0,584.0')] ).
cnf(1836,plain,
( c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,u)
| equal(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),skf18(u))),u) ),
inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[256,755]),
[iquote('0:Rew:256.0,755.1')] ).
cnf(2024,plain,
c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,v_na____),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1836,1798]),
[iquote('0:Res:1836.1,1798.0')] ).
cnf(2110,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[2024,189]),
[iquote('0:MRR:2024.0,189.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 04:07:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.99/1.16
% 0.99/1.16 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.99/1.16 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.99/1.16 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.99/1.16 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.16 SPASS derived 44 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1381 clauses.
% 0.99/1.16 SPASS allocated 104173 KBytes.
% 0.99/1.16 SPASS spent 0:00:00.81 on the problem.
% 0.99/1.16 0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.99/1.16 0:00:00.35 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.99/1.16 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.99/1.16 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.99/1.16 0:00:00.27 for the reduction.
% 0.99/1.16
% 0.99/1.16
% 0.99/1.16 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 10 :
% 0.99/1.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.99/1.16 Formulae used in the proof : fact_o fact_One__nat__def fact_semiring__norm_I115_J conj_0 fact_odd__nat__equiv__def2
% 0.99/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------