TSTP Solution File: SWW198+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWW198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:24:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.83s 3.05s
% Output   : Refutation 2.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  13 unt;   2 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (  13 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,v_na____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_o) ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X)
    | X = c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))),'SKOLEMAAAV3'(X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_odd__nat__equiv__def2) ).

cnf(110,axiom,
    c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Int_Oint,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_number__of__is__id) ).

cnf(443,axiom,
    c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(X),Y) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,Y,c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,X,Y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_mult__Suc) ).

cnf(860,axiom,
    c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat),X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_nat__mult__1) ).

cnf(905,axiom,
    c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat) = c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_One__nat__def) ).

cnf(906,axiom,
    c_Nat_OSuc(X) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Suc__eq__plus1__left) ).

cnf(958,axiom,
    c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Int_Oint) = c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Int_Oint,c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_one__is__num__one) ).

cnf(959,plain,
    c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Int_Oint) = c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[958,110,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1112,axiom,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)) = c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_nat__1__add__1) ).

cnf(1113,plain,
    c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)) = c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Int_Oint))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1112,959,906,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1694,negated_conjecture,
    v_na____ != c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

cnf(1695,plain,
    v_na____ != c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1694,860,443,1113,959,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1781,plain,
    ( c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X)
    | X = c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,'SKOLEMAAAV3'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV3'(X))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[56,860,905,443,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2933,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1781,1,1695]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SWW198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 03:34:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  "."
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-05T03:34:45
% 0.21/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-06-05T03:34:45
% 0.55/0.71  
% 0.55/0.73  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of| |tc_Int_Oint| ?X) ?X).
% 0.55/0.73  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_Nat_Onat| ?X ?X).
% 0.55/0.73  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_Int_Oint| ?X ?X).
% 0.55/0.75  WARNING:
% 0.55/0.75     |class_Groups_Ozero| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.55/0.75  WARNING:
% 0.55/0.75     |class_Groups_Oone| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 2.83/3.05  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_RealDef_Oreal| ?X ?X).
% 2.83/3.05  
% 2.83/3.05  #||
% 2.83/3.05  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.83/3.05  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.83/3.05  ||#
% 2.83/3.05  
% 2.83/3.05  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.83/3.05  ;     32542 formulas have been input or derived (from 642 formulas).
% 2.83/3.05  ;      2933 ( 9%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.83/3.05  ;          455 (16%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.83/3.05  ;         2478 (84%) are still being kept.
% 2.83/3.05  ; 
% 2.83/3.05  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.221   9%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.031   1%   Assert                       (1,186 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.212   8%   Process new row              (29,741 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.835  32%   Resolution                   (1,282 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.012   0%   Paramodulation               (641 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (14 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.079   3%   Condensing                   (8,141 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.168   7%   Forward subsumption          (8,141 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.060   2%   Backward subsumption         (1,668 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.108   4%   Clause clause subsumption    (11,831 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.478  19%   Forward simplification       (29,733 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.017   1%   Backward simplification      (2,706 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.240   9%   Ordering                     (14,197 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.004   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.83/3.05  ;     0.107   4%   Other
% 2.83/3.05  ;     2.573        Total
% 2.83/3.05  ;     2.575        Real time
% 2.83/3.05  ; 
% 2.83/3.05  ; Term-hash-array has 3,767 terms in all.
% 2.83/3.05  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,476 entries (1,476 at peak, 1,668 added, 192 deleted).
% 2.83/3.05  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6,168 nodes (6,168 at peak, 7,445 added, 1,277 deleted).
% 2.83/3.05  ;  Retrieved 16,577 possibly forward subsuming rows in 8,141 calls.
% 2.83/3.05  ;  Retrieved 1,334 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,668 calls.
% 2.83/3.05  ; Path-index has 3,518 entries (3,518 at peak, 3,802 added, 284 deleted).
% 2.83/3.05  ; Path-index has 10,687 nodes (10,687 at peak, 11,485 added, 798 deleted).
% 2.83/3.05  ; Trie-index has 3,518 entries (3,518 at peak, 3,802 added, 284 deleted).
% 2.83/3.05  ; Trie-index has 13,493 nodes (13,493 at peak, 15,845 added, 2,352 deleted).
% 2.83/3.05  ; Retrieved 98,479 generalization terms in 148,745 calls.
% 2.83/3.05  ; Retrieved 1,526 instance terms in 1,069 calls.
% 2.83/3.05  ; Retrieved 1,044,272 unifiable terms in 26,561 calls.
% 2.83/3.05  ; 
% 2.83/3.05  ; The agenda of rows to process has 56 entries:
% 2.83/3.05  ;     1 with value 5               1 with value 26               3 with value 36
% 2.83/3.05  ;     1 with value 7               6 with value 28               2 with value 37
% 2.83/3.05  ;     1 with value 14              3 with value 31               2 with value 38
% 2.83/3.05  ;     2 with value 18              3 with value 32              11 with value 41
% 2.83/3.05  ;     5 with value 22              1 with value 33               2 with value 46
% 2.83/3.05  ;     4 with value 24              2 with value 34               1 with value 48
% 2.83/3.05  ;     2 with value 25              3 with value 35
% 2.83/3.05  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 705 entries:
% 2.83/3.05  ;     1 with value 17             12 with value 30               6 with value 44
% 2.83/3.05  ;    58 with value 18             14 with value 31               2 with value 45
% 2.83/3.05  ;    32 with value 19             16 with value 32               1 with value 46
% 2.83/3.05  ;    53 with value 20             16 with value 33               1 with value 47
% 2.83/3.05  ;    56 with value 21             14 with value 34               3 with value 52
% 2.83/3.05  ;    33 with value 22             30 with value 35               1 with value 54
% 2.83/3.05  ;    20 with value 23              2 with value 36               2 with value 56
% 2.83/3.05  ;    66 with value 24             17 with value 37               1 with value 59
% 2.83/3.05  ;    26 with value 25              5 with value 38               1 with value 64
% 2.83/3.05  ;    17 with value 26             15 with value 39               1 with value 77
% 2.83/3.05  ;   115 with value 27              2 with value 40               1 with value 100
% 2.83/3.05  ;    40 with value 28              4 with value 42               1 with value 169
% 2.83/3.05  ;    14 with value 29              6 with value 43
% 2.83/3.05  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1133 entries:
% 2.83/3.05  ;     4 with value (4 6)          97 with value (4 19)           1 with value (4 32)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    16 with value (4 7)          54 with value (4 20)           1 with value (4 33)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    28 with value (4 8)          43 with value (4 21)           2 with value (4 34)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    44 with value (4 9)          23 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 40)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    64 with value (4 10)         14 with value (4 23)           1 with value (4 45)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    62 with value (4 11)         21 with value (4 24)           3 with value (4 46)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    79 with value (4 12)          8 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 47)
% 2.83/3.05  ;   111 with value (4 13)          8 with value (4 26)           3 with value (4 50)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    82 with value (4 14)         27 with value (4 27)           2 with value (4 80)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    95 with value (4 15)          4 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 83)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    57 with value (4 16)          6 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 124)
% 2.83/3.05  ;   104 with value (4 17)          4 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 180)
% 2.83/3.05  ;    58 with value (4 18)
% 2.83/3.05  Evaluation took:
% 2.83/3.05    2.576 seconds of real time
% 2.83/3.05    2.3712 seconds of user run time
% 2.83/3.05    0.204069 seconds of system run time
% 2.83/3.05    [Run times include 0.171 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.83/3.05    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.83/3.05    0 page faults and
% 2.83/3.05    191,884,080 bytes consed.
% 2.83/3.05  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.83/3.05  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-05T03:34:48
% 2.83/3.05  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.83/3.05  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------