TSTP Solution File: SWW198+1 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : SWW198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:18:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 141.66s 142.00s
% Output   : Refutation 141.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWW198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 04:12:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 141.66/142.00  # Version:  1.3
% 141.66/142.00  # SZS status Theorem
% 141.66/142.00  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 141.66/142.00  fof(fact_o,axiom,(~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,v_na____)),input).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c4263,axiom,~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,v_na____),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[fact_o])).
% 141.66/142.00  cnf(c4264,axiom,~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,v_na____),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c4263])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(conj_0,conjecture,(?[B_m]:v_na____=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m))),input).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c87,negated_conjecture,(~(?[B_m]:v_na____=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m)))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[conj_0])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c88,negated_conjecture,(![B_m]:v_na____!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c87])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c89,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:v_na____!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),X2))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c88])).
% 141.66/142.00  cnf(c90,negated_conjecture,v_na____!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),X3134)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c89])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(fact_odd__Suc__mult__two__ex,axiom,(![V_nb_2]:((~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,V_nb_2))<=>(?[B_m]:V_nb_2=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m))))),input).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c4108,axiom,(![V_nb_2]:(~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,V_nb_2)<=>(?[B_m]:V_nb_2=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[fact_odd__Suc__mult__two__ex])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c4109,axiom,(![V_nb_2]:((c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,V_nb_2)|(?[B_m]:V_nb_2=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m))))&((![B_m]:V_nb_2!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m)))|~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,V_nb_2)))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c4108])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c4110,axiom,((![V_nb_2]:(c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,V_nb_2)|(?[B_m]:V_nb_2=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m)))))&(![V_nb_2]:((![B_m]:V_nb_2!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),B_m)))|~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,V_nb_2)))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c4109])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c4111,axiom,((![X2671]:(c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X2671)|(?[X2672]:X2671=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),X2672)))))&(![X2673]:((![X2674]:X2673!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),X2674)))|~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X2673)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c4110])).
% 141.66/142.00  fof(c4113,axiom,(![X2671]:(![X2673]:(![X2674]:((c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X2671)|X2671=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),skolem0017(X2671))))&(X2673!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),X2674))|~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X2673)))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c4112,axiom,((![X2671]:(c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X2671)|X2671=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),skolem0017(X2671)))))&(![X2673]:((![X2674]:X2673!=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),X2674)))|~c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X2673)))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c4111])).])).
% 141.66/142.00  cnf(c4114,axiom,c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,X9923)|X9923=c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),skolem0017(X9923))),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c4113])).
% 141.66/142.00  cnf(c99495,plain,c_Parity_Oeven__odd__class_Oeven(tc_Nat_Onat,v_na____),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c4114, c90])).
% 141.66/142.00  cnf(c99618,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c99495, c4264])).
% 141.66/142.00  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 141.66/142.00  
% 141.66/142.00  # Initial clauses    : 1924
% 141.66/142.00  # Processed clauses  : 6005
% 141.66/142.00  # Factors computed   : 22
% 141.66/142.00  # Resolvents computed: 95341
% 141.66/142.00  # Tautologies deleted: 132
% 141.66/142.00  # Forward subsumed   : 2912
% 141.66/142.00  # Backward subsumed  : 39
% 141.66/142.00  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 141.66/142.00  # User time          : 141.335 s
% 141.66/142.00  # System time        : 0.226 s
% 141.66/142.00  # Total time         : 141.561 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------