TSTP Solution File: SWW192+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWW192+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:24:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.51s 8.72s
% Output   : Refutation 8.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  16 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_z) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_assms) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    v_z = c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(v_x____,v_y____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_z) ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(X,Y)) = c_NthRoot_Osqrt(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),Y),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_complex__norm) ).

cnf(137,axiom,
    ( ~ class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(X)
    | hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X),Y),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)))) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X),Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_power2__eq__square) ).

cnf(210,axiom,
    ( c_NthRoot_Osqrt(X) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)
    | X = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__sqrt__eq__1__iff) ).

cnf(564,axiom,
    c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat) = c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_One__nat__def) ).

cnf(605,axiom,
    c_Nat_OSuc(c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))) = c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_semiring__norm_I115_J) ).

cnf(606,plain,
    c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)) = c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[605,564,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1464,axiom,
    class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_RealDef__Oreal__Groups_Omonoid__mult) ).

cnf(1553,negated_conjecture,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x____),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_y____),c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Int_OBit0(c_Int_OBit1(c_Int_OPls))))) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

cnf(1554,plain,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x____),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_y____),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)))) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1553,606,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1566,plain,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(X,Y)) = c_NthRoot_Osqrt(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),Y),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[54,606,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1575,plain,
    ( ~ class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(X)
    | hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X),Y),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X),Y),Y) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[137,606,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4690,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X),X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1575,1464]) ).

cnf(4691,plain,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_x____),v_x____),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_y____),v_y____)) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1554,4690,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4693,plain,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Complex_Ocomplex_OComplex(X,Y)) = c_NthRoot_Osqrt(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X),X),hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),Y),Y))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1566,4690,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4740,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[210,4691]),2,3,4693,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWW192+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 12:31:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-05T12:31:15
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n026.cluster.edu at 2022-06-05T12:31:15
% 0.52/0.71  
% 0.52/0.72  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|c_Int_Onumber__class_Onumber__of| |tc_Int_Oint| ?X) ?X).
% 0.52/0.73  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_RealDef_Oreal| ?X ?X).
% 0.52/0.73  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_Nat_Onat| ?X ?X).
% 0.52/0.75  WARNING:
% 0.52/0.75     |class_Groups_Ozero| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.52/0.75  WARNING:
% 0.52/0.75     |class_Groups_Oone| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.52/0.75  WARNING:
% 0.52/0.75     |hBOOL| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 8.51/8.72  ; Recognized possible left identity assertion (|c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq| |tc_Int_Oint| ?X ?X).
% 8.51/8.72  
% 8.51/8.72  #||
% 8.51/8.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.51/8.72  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 8.51/8.73  ||#
% 8.51/8.73  
% 8.51/8.73  ; Summary of computation:
% 8.51/8.73  ;    152753 formulas have been input or derived (from 898 formulas).
% 8.51/8.73  ;      4740 ( 3%) were retained.  Of these,
% 8.51/8.73  ;          566 (12%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 8.51/8.73  ;         4174 (88%) are still being kept.
% 8.51/8.73  ; 
% 8.51/8.73  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.220   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.033   0%   Assert                       (1,231 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.627   8%   Process new row              (145,660 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     2.324  28%   Resolution                   (1,794 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.051   1%   Paramodulation               (897 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (11 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.121   1%   Condensing                   (12,705 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.308   4%   Forward subsumption          (12,705 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.101   1%   Backward subsumption         (2,522 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.182   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (19,864 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     3.350  41%   Forward simplification       (145,601 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.045   1%   Backward simplification      (4,649 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.454   6%   Ordering                     (166,728 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.003   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     0.416   5%   Other
% 8.51/8.73  ;     8.236        Total
% 8.51/8.73  ;     8.251        Real time
% 8.51/8.73  ; 
% 8.51/8.73  ; Term-hash-array has 7,305 terms in all.
% 8.51/8.73  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,176 entries (2,176 at peak, 2,522 added, 346 deleted).
% 8.51/8.73  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 10,484 nodes (10,484 at peak, 13,526 added, 3,042 deleted).
% 8.51/8.73  ;  Retrieved 26,998 possibly forward subsuming rows in 12,705 calls.
% 8.51/8.73  ;  Retrieved 1,955 possibly backward subsumed rows in 2,522 calls.
% 8.51/8.73  ; Path-index has 6,827 entries (6,827 at peak, 7,461 added, 634 deleted).
% 8.51/8.73  ; Path-index has 11,730 nodes (11,730 at peak, 12,688 added, 958 deleted).
% 8.51/8.73  ; Trie-index has 6,827 entries (6,827 at peak, 7,461 added, 634 deleted).
% 8.51/8.73  ; Trie-index has 25,949 nodes (25,949 at peak, 29,930 added, 3,981 deleted).
% 8.51/8.73  ; Retrieved 577,189 generalization terms in 1,209,096 calls.
% 8.51/8.73  ; Retrieved 4,451 instance terms in 2,585 calls.
% 8.51/8.73  ; Retrieved 2,751,307 unifiable terms in 52,104 calls.
% 8.51/8.73  ; 
% 8.51/8.73  ; The agenda of rows to process has 62 entries:
% 8.51/8.73  ;     3 with value 25             17 with value 28               1 with value 31
% 8.51/8.73  ;     6 with value 26             33 with value 30               2 with value 61
% 8.51/8.73  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 469 entries:
% 8.51/8.73  ;    16 with value 23              3 with value 34               1 with value 46
% 8.51/8.73  ;    37 with value 24             15 with value 35               1 with value 49
% 8.51/8.73  ;    30 with value 25              6 with value 36               1 with value 51
% 8.51/8.73  ;    11 with value 26              6 with value 37               1 with value 53
% 8.51/8.73  ;    65 with value 27              6 with value 38               1 with value 54
% 8.51/8.73  ;    22 with value 28             22 with value 39               2 with value 58
% 8.51/8.73  ;    18 with value 29              5 with value 40               1 with value 59
% 8.51/8.73  ;    20 with value 30             13 with value 41               1 with value 64
% 8.51/8.73  ;    38 with value 31              3 with value 42               2 with value 66
% 8.51/8.73  ;    48 with value 32              5 with value 43               1 with value 112
% 8.51/8.73  ;    49 with value 33             19 with value 45
% 8.51/8.73  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2828 entries:
% 8.51/8.73  ;     1 with value (4 4)         189 with value (4 19)           3 with value (4 34)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     4 with value (4 5)         191 with value (4 20)          30 with value (4 35)
% 8.51/8.73  ;     6 with value (4 6)          98 with value (4 21)          28 with value (4 36)
% 8.51/8.73  ;    31 with value (4 7)         112 with value (4 22)          15 with value (4 37)
% 8.51/8.73  ;    26 with value (4 8)         143 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 38)
% 8.51/8.73  ;    45 with value (4 9)         119 with value (4 24)          36 with value (4 39)
% 8.51/8.73  ;    73 with value (4 10)        105 with value (4 25)           9 with value (4 40)
% 8.51/8.73  ;    80 with value (4 11)        166 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 41)
% 8.51/8.73  ;   105 with value (4 12)         96 with value (4 27)           4 with value (4 42)
% 8.51/8.73  ;   129 with value (4 13)         63 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 43)
% 8.51/8.73  ;   170 with value (4 14)         62 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 44)
% 8.51/8.73  ;   184 with value (4 15)         41 with value (4 30)           6 with value (4 45)
% 8.51/8.73  ;   112 with value (4 16)         20 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 53)
% 8.51/8.73  ;   138 with value (4 17)         27 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 58)
% 8.51/8.73  ;   124 with value (4 18)         28 with value (4 33)
% 8.51/8.73  Evaluation took:
% 8.51/8.73    8.252 seconds of real time
% 8.51/8.73    7.506181 seconds of user run time
% 8.51/8.73    0.745085 seconds of system run time
% 8.51/8.73    [Run times include 0.676 seconds GC run time.]
% 8.51/8.73    0 calls to %EVAL
% 8.51/8.73    0 page faults and
% 8.51/8.73    656,166,440 bytes consed.
% 8.51/8.73  :PROOF-FOUND
% 8.51/8.73  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-05T12:31:23
% 8.51/8.73  :PROOF-FOUND
% 8.51/8.73  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------