TSTP Solution File: SWW190+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW190+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 24.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  19   ~;  20   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (  13 sgn  29   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    ? [X4] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_HOL_Obool)),c_Set_OCollect(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_P)),X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_Collect__def,axiom,
    ! [X12,X7] : c_Set_OCollect(X7,X12) = X12,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_Collect__def) ).

fof(fact_isUb__UNIV__I,axiom,
    ! [X30,X10,X7] :
      ( class_Orderings_Oord(X7)
     => ( ! [X31] :
            ( c_member(X7,X31,X10)
           => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X7,X31,X30) )
       => hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(X7,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X7,tc_HOL_Obool)),X10),X30)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_isUb__UNIV__I) ).

fof(arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Oord,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Oord(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Oord) ).

fof(fact_mem__def,axiom,
    ! [X14,X6,X7] :
      ( c_member(X7,X6,X14)
    <=> hBOOL(hAPP(X14,X6)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_mem__def) ).

fof(fact_bz,axiom,
    ? [X5] :
    ! [X3] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,X3))
     => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X3,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_bz) ).

fof(fact_less__eq__real__def,axiom,
    ! [X19,X6] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X6,X19)
    <=> ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X6,X19)
        | X6 = X19 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fact_less__eq__real__def) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X4] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_HOL_Obool)),c_Set_OCollect(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_P)),X4)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5] : ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_HOL_Obool)),c_Set_OCollect(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_P)),X5)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] : c_Set_OCollect(X14,X13) = X13,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Collect__def]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X32,X33,X34] :
      ( ( c_member(X34,esk15_3(X32,X33,X34),X33)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(X34,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X34,tc_HOL_Obool)),X33),X32))
        | ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X34) )
      & ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X34,esk15_3(X32,X33,X34),X32)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(X34,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X34,tc_HOL_Obool)),X33),X32))
        | ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X34) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_isUb__UNIV__I])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_HOL_Obool)),c_Set_OCollect(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_P)),X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    c_Set_OCollect(X1,X2) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(X1,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X3))
    | c_member(X1,esk15_3(X3,X2,X1),X2)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    class_Orderings_Oord(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Oord]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ( ~ c_member(X17,X16,X15)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(X15,X16)) )
      & ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X15,X16))
        | c_member(X17,X16,X15) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_mem__def])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_HOL_Obool)),v_P),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( c_member(tc_RealDef_Oreal,esk15_3(X1,X2,tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2)
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(tc_RealDef_Oreal,tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X7] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,X7))
      | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X7,esk21_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_bz])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2))
    | ~ c_member(X3,X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    c_member(tc_RealDef_Oreal,esk15_3(X1,v_P,tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_P),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X20,X21,X20,X21] :
      ( ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X21,X20)
        | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X21,X20)
        | X21 = X20 )
      & ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X21,X20)
        | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X21,X20) )
      & ( X21 != X20
        | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X21,X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_less__eq__real__def])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,esk21_0)
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(v_P,esk15_3(X1,v_P,tc_RealDef_Oreal))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,esk15_3(X1,v_P,tc_RealDef_Oreal),esk21_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Lubs_OisUb(X1,c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),X2),X3))
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X1)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,esk15_3(X3,X2,X1),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,esk15_3(X1,v_P,tc_RealDef_Oreal),esk21_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_14])]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : SWW190+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 03:14:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/23.49  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/23.50  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/23.50  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.43/23.50  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/24.61  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.44/24.61  
% 0.44/24.61  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.44/24.61  # OLD status Res
% 0.44/24.61  # Preprocessing time       : 0.115 s
% 0.44/24.61  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 0.44/24.61  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/24.61  # Preprocessing time       : 0.040 s
% 0.44/24.61  
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof found!
% 0.44/24.61  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/24.61  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object total steps             : 29
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object clause steps            : 15
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object formula steps           : 14
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.44/24.61  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.44/24.61  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.44/24.61  # Parsed axioms                        : 1189
% 0.44/24.61  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 750
% 0.44/24.61  # Initial clauses                      : 658
% 0.44/24.61  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 36
% 0.44/24.61  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 622
% 0.44/24.61  # Processed clauses                    : 1878
% 0.44/24.61  # ...of these trivial                  : 58
% 0.44/24.61  # ...subsumed                          : 1044
% 0.44/24.61  # ...remaining for further processing  : 776
% 0.44/24.61  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 137
% 0.44/24.61  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.44/24.61  # Backward-subsumed                    : 18
% 0.44/24.61  # Backward-rewritten                   : 29
% 0.44/24.61  # Generated clauses                    : 18044
% 0.44/24.61  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 15564
% 0.44/24.61  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 130
% 0.44/24.61  # Paramodulations                      : 17860
% 0.44/24.61  # Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.44/24.61  # Equation resolutions                 : 179
% 0.44/24.61  # Current number of processed clauses  : 704
% 0.44/24.61  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 187
% 0.44/24.61  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 12
% 0.44/24.61  #    Negative unit clauses             : 29
% 0.44/24.61  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 476
% 0.44/24.61  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13574
% 0.44/24.61  # ...number of literals in the above   : 39292
% 0.44/24.61  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.44/24.61  # Current number of archived clauses   : 48
% 0.44/24.61  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16715
% 0.44/24.61  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15345
% 0.44/24.61  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 748
% 0.44/24.61  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2367
% 0.44/24.61  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 78
% 0.44/24.61  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1393
% 0.44/24.61  # BW rewrite match successes           : 147
% 0.44/24.61  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.44/24.61  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.44/24.61  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 352912
% 0.44/24.61  
% 0.44/24.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/24.61  # User time                : 0.244 s
% 0.44/24.61  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.44/24.61  # Total time               : 0.254 s
% 0.44/24.61  # Maximum resident set size: 17368 pages
% 0.44/46.51  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.51  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.52  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.55  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.56  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.57  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/46.58  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.44/46.58  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.44/46.58  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------