TSTP Solution File: SWW182+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW182+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.52s 21.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 17 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 2 sgn 22 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_offset__poly__pCons,axiom,
! [X4,X24,X19,X5] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
=> c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X19,X24),X4) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X5,X4,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,X24,X4)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X19,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,X24,X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_offset__poly__pCons) ).
fof(fact_offset__poly__0,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
=> c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)),X4) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_offset__poly__0) ).
fof(tfree_0,hypothesis,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',tfree_0) ).
fof(fact_smult__0__right,axiom,
! [X19,X5] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
=> c_Polynomial_Osmult(X5,X19,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_smult__0__right) ).
fof(fact_add__poly__code_I1_J,axiom,
! [X22,X5] :
( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X5)
=> c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)),X22) = X22 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_add__poly__code_I1_J) ).
fof(clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add,axiom,
! [X94] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X94)
=> class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X94) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X25,X26,X27,X28] :
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X28)
| c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X28,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X28,X27,X26),X25) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X28),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X28,X25,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X28,X26,X25)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X28,X27,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X28,X26,X25))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_offset__poly__pCons])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X7)
| c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X7,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X7)),X6) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X7)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_offset__poly__0])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,X3),X4) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X4,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,X3,X4)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,X3,X4)))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))),X3) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X3,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[tfree_0]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X20,X21] :
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X21)
| c_Polynomial_Osmult(X21,X20,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X21))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X21)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_smult__0__right])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Polynomial_Osmult(t_a,v_h,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X24)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X24),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X24)),X23) = X23 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_add__poly__code_I1_J])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)))) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2) = X2
| ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X95] :
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X95)
| class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X95) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWW182+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 18:57:24 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.52/21.69 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.52/21.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.114 s
% 0.52/21.69
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof found!
% 0.52/21.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.52/21.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object clause steps : 12
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object formula steps : 14
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.52/21.69 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.52/21.69 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.52/21.69 # Parsed axioms : 1181
% 0.52/21.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.52/21.69 # Initial clauses : 1638
% 0.52/21.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 80
% 0.52/21.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1558
% 0.52/21.69 # Processed clauses : 23993
% 0.52/21.69 # ...of these trivial : 1371
% 0.52/21.69 # ...subsumed : 17737
% 0.52/21.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 4885
% 0.52/21.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4741
% 0.52/21.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 1111384
% 0.52/21.69 # Backward-subsumed : 119
% 0.52/21.69 # Backward-rewritten : 193
% 0.52/21.69 # Generated clauses : 1375403
% 0.52/21.69 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1286240
% 0.52/21.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4476
% 0.52/21.69 # Paramodulations : 1370017
% 0.52/21.69 # Factorizations : 9
% 0.52/21.69 # Equation resolutions : 5218
% 0.52/21.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 4468
% 0.52/21.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 473
% 0.52/21.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 78
% 0.52/21.69 # Negative unit clauses : 107
% 0.52/21.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 3810
% 0.52/21.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 91757
% 0.52/21.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 299628
% 0.52/21.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.52/21.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 313
% 0.52/21.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2470932
% 0.52/21.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1488607
% 0.52/21.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16158
% 0.52/21.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 106999
% 0.52/21.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 33
% 0.52/21.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11410
% 0.52/21.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 393
% 0.52/21.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.52/21.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.52/21.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 32253631
% 0.52/21.69
% 0.52/21.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/21.69 # User time : 20.377 s
% 0.52/21.69 # System time : 0.146 s
% 0.52/21.69 # Total time : 20.523 s
% 0.52/21.69 # Maximum resident set size: 148804 pages
% 0.52/23.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.52/23.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.52/23.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.52/23.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.58 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.59 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.60 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.52/23.61 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.52/23.61 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------