TSTP Solution File: SWW091_1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWW091_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:49:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 42.62s 6.54s
% Output   : Proof 75.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWW091_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 22:10:46 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.63  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 24.99/4.23  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 25.39/4.26  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 25.39/4.26  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 25.39/4.26  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 25.39/4.26  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 25.39/4.26  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 25.39/4.26  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 42.33/6.49  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 42.62/6.53  Prover 6: proved (5905ms)
% 42.62/6.53  
% 42.62/6.54  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 42.62/6.54  
% 42.67/6.55  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 49.42/7.48  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 49.42/7.48  Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 49.42/7.48  Prover 1: proved (6863ms)
% 50.12/7.52  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 50.12/7.52  Prover 3: stopped
% 53.40/7.96  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 57.48/8.51  Prover 0: stopped
% 58.56/8.67  Prover 4: stopped
% 58.56/8.68  Prover 2: stopped
% 62.86/9.45  Prover 7: stopped
% 75.88/12.50  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 75.88/12.50  Prover 5: stopped
% 75.88/12.50  
% 75.88/12.50  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 75.88/12.50  
% 75.88/12.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 75.88/12.51  Assumptions after simplification:
% 75.88/12.51  ---------------------------------
% 75.88/12.51  
% 75.88/12.51    (0)
% 75.88/12.52    $false
% 75.88/12.52  
% 75.88/12.52  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 75.88/12.52  ---------------------------------
% 75.88/12.52  
% 75.88/12.52  Begin of proof
% 75.88/12.52  | 
% 75.88/12.52  | CLOSE: (0) is inconsistent.
% 75.88/12.52  | 
% 75.88/12.52  End of proof
% 75.88/12.52  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 75.88/12.52  
% 75.88/12.52  11923ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------