TSTP Solution File: SWV985-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 21:36:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 04:00:45 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.55/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.55/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.55/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.55/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.55/0.62
% 0.55/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.55/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.55/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.62 % File : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.57/0.62 % Domain : Software Verification
% 0.57/0.62 % Problem : Java type soundness 555_24
% 0.57/0.62 % Version : Especial.
% 0.57/0.62 % English :
% 0.57/0.62
% 0.57/0.63 % Refs : [vON99] von Oheimb & Nipkow (1999), Machine-Checking the Java
% 0.57/0.63 % : [Nip10] Nipkow (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.57/0.63 % : [BN10] Boehme & Nipkow (2010), Sledgehammer: Judgement Day
% 0.57/0.63 % Source : [Nip10]
% 0.57/0.63 % Names : TypeSafe-555_24 [Nip10]
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.57/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0
% 0.57/0.63 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% 0.57/0.63 % Number of literals : 8 ( 3 equ; 2 neg)
% 0.57/0.63 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.57/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.57/0.63 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-5 aty)
% 0.57/0.63 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.57/0.63 % Number of variables : 7 ( 3 sgn)
% 0.57/0.63 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 % Comments :
% 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_COMBI__def_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.63 c_COMBI(V_P,T_a) = V_P ).
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_refl_I2_J_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.63 c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P,v_E,v_s_H) ).
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_refl_I1_J_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.63 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,c_State_Ohp(v_s_H),v_E,v_e_H,v_T____) ).
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_COMBI__def__raw_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.63 c_COMBI(v_P,t_a) = v_P ).
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63 ~ c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P,v_E,v_s_H) ).
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_ATP__Linkup_Oequal__imp__fequal_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.63 c_fequal(V_x,V_x,T_a) ).
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(cls_ATP__Linkup_Ofequal__imp__equal_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.63 ( V_X = V_Y
% 0.57/0.63 | ~ c_fequal(V_X,V_Y,T_a) ) ).
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.57/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.57/0.63 %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:15)
% 0.57/0.63 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:5)
% 0.57/0.63 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.57/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.57/0.63 %SharedTerms:9
% 0.57/0.63 %goalClause: 19
% 0.57/0.63 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.57/0.63 [16]P1(a1,a2,a4)
% 0.57/0.63 [19]~P1(a1,a2,a4)
% 0.57/0.63 [18]P3(a1,f3(a4),a2,a5,a6)
% 0.57/0.63 [17]P2(x171,x171,x172)
% 0.57/0.63 [20]E(x201,x202)+~P2(x201,x202,x203)
% 0.57/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.57/0.63 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.57/0.63 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.57/0.63 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.57/0.63 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41),f3(x42))
% 0.57/0.63 [5]P1(x52,x53,x54)+~E(x51,x52)+~P1(x51,x53,x54)
% 0.57/0.63 [6]P1(x63,x62,x64)+~E(x61,x62)+~P1(x63,x61,x64)
% 0.57/0.63 [7]P1(x73,x74,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P1(x73,x74,x71)
% 0.57/0.63 [8]P2(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83,x84)
% 0.57/0.63 [9]P2(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91,x94)
% 0.57/0.63 [10]P2(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x103,x104,x101)
% 0.57/0.63 [11]P3(x112,x113,x114,x115,x116)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x111,x113,x114,x115,x116)
% 0.57/0.63 [12]P3(x123,x122,x124,x125,x126)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x123,x121,x124,x125,x126)
% 0.57/0.63 [13]P3(x133,x134,x132,x135,x136)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x134,x131,x135,x136)
% 0.57/0.63 [14]P3(x143,x144,x145,x142,x146)+~E(x141,x142)+~P3(x143,x144,x145,x141,x146)
% 0.57/0.63 [15]P3(x153,x154,x155,x156,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P3(x153,x154,x155,x156,x151)
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.57/0.63 ($false),
% 0.57/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,16]),
% 0.57/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.57/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------