TSTP Solution File: SWV972-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV972-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1,v_Us____,tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_es_Ha____,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
    c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_Us____,v_es_Ha____,v_h_Ha____),v_Us____,tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_es_Ha____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_Us____,v_es_Ha____,v_h_Ha____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1,v_Us____,tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_es_Ha____,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1,v_Us____,tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_es_Ha____,X1) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_es_Ha____,X1)
    | ~ c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1,v_Us____,tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_Us____,v_es_Ha____,v_h_Ha____),v_Us____,tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty),
    cls_CHAINED_1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_es_Ha____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_Us____,v_es_Ha____,v_h_Ha____)),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SWV972-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 06:27:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.53  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with pid 11656 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 217s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 109s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 109s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 11666 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 10 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 217s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 121s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 109s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 508
% 0.20/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 508
% 0.20/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.20/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 505
% 0.20/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 111
% 0.20/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.20/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 9
% 0.20/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 99
% 0.20/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 29
% 0.20/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
% 0.20/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 24
% 0.20/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.20/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.20/0.53  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 9
% 0.20/0.53  # ...of those cached                   : 3
% 0.20/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 99
% 0.20/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 66
% 0.20/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.20/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 27
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 414
% 0.20/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 865
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.20/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 227
% 0.20/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 163
% 0.20/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.20/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.20/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.20/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 11543
% 0.20/0.53  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 894
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.20/0.53  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Total time               : 0.030 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2748 pages
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  # User time                : 0.064 s
% 0.20/0.53  # System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Total time               : 0.086 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2080 pages
% 0.20/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.53/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------