TSTP Solution File: SWV966-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:15:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.85s 1.22s
% Output : Refutation 0.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.15/0.14 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 23:32:44 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.85/1.22 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.85/1.22 Process 7646 was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.85/1.22 Wed Jun 15 23:32:44 2022
% 0.85/1.22 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_7493_n013.cluster.edu".
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_7493_n013.cluster.edu
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.85/1.22 set(auto2).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.85/1.22 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.85/1.22 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.85/1.22 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.85/1.22 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.85/1.22 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.85/1.22 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.85/1.22 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.85/1.22 clear(print_given).
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (339 formulas)
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.85/1.22 Function symbol KB weights: tc_String_Ochar=1. v_P=1. v_ha____=1. tc_Value_Oval=1. c_Type_Oty_OBoolean=1. v_h_Ha____=1. tc_Type_Oty=1. v_e_Ha____=1. tc_nat=1. v_ea____=1. v_la____=1. v_E____=1. v_esa____=1. c_Type_Oty_ONT=1. v_Ts____=1. t_a=1. v_M____=1. v_T____=1. hAPP=1. tc_prod=1. c_TypeRel_Owiden=1. tc_fun=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OVal=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Onew=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OVar=1. c_COMBI=1. tc_List_Olist=1. tc_Option_Ooption=1. tc_Expr_Oexp=1. c_fequal=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OSeq=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCast=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OLAss=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OWhile=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCond=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCall=1. c_Pair=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OBlock=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss=1. v_sko__local__XCallObj__2__1=1. v_sko__local__XCallObj__Xhyps__2__1=1. v_sko__local__XIH__1=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__5__1=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Oexp__case=1.
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 % Starting search at 0.06 seconds.
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.85/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.85/1.22 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 % Proof 1 at 0.11 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.85/1.22 % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.85/1.22 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.85/1.22 % Maximum clause weight is 25.000.
% 0.85/1.22 % Given clauses 340.
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 292 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(A,B,C,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(D,E,F,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),V6) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(A,B,C,F,V7) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(A,B,C,D,c_Type_Oty_ONT) # label(cls_WTrtCallNT_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.22 317 hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(A,B),C),C)) # label(cls_widen__refl_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.22 335 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_esa____,v_Ts____) # label(cls_CHAINED_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.22 336 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT) # label(cls_CHAINED_0_01) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.22 337 -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),A),v_T____)) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),A) # label(cls_conjecture_0) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.22 393 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(A,B,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),C) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,A,c_Type_Oty_ONT). [resolve(335,a,292,b)].
% 0.85/1.22 707 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,A,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),B). [resolve(393,b,336,a)].
% 0.85/1.22 708 -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),A),v_T____)). [back_unit_del(337),unit_del(b,707)].
% 0.85/1.22 709 $F. [resolve(708,a,317,a)].
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 Given=340. Generated=911. Kept=601. proofs=1.
% 0.85/1.22 Usable=339. Sos=256. Demods=16. Limbo=1, Disabled=343. Hints=0.
% 0.85/1.22 Megabytes=1.17.
% 0.85/1.22 User_CPU=0.11, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.85/1.22 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.85/1.22
% 0.85/1.22 Process 7646 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 15 23:32:44 2022
% 0.85/1.22 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------