TSTP Solution File: SWV966-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:08:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 10 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.o2J0Ukelvl/E---3.1_11859.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.o2J0Ukelvl/E---3.1_11859.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrtCallNT_0,axiom,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(X1,X2,X3,X6,X8)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.o2J0Ukelvl/E---3.1_11859.p',cls_WTrtCallNT_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_esa____,v_Ts____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.o2J0Ukelvl/E---3.1_11859.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.o2J0Ukelvl/E---3.1_11859.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(X1,X2,X3,X6,X8)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
cls_WTrtCallNT_0 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_esa____,v_Ts____),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X1,X2,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X3)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,X1,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 04:21:24 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.55 Running first-order model finding
% 0.24/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.o2J0Ukelvl/E---3.1_11859.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 11936 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.41/0.60 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 226s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11943 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.41/0.60 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.41/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 450s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.41/0.60
% 0.41/0.60 # Proof found!
% 0.41/0.60 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.60 # Parsed axioms : 339
% 0.41/0.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Initial clauses : 339
% 0.41/0.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.41/0.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 337
% 0.41/0.60 # Processed clauses : 563
% 0.41/0.60 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # ...subsumed : 108
% 0.41/0.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 455
% 0.41/0.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Generated clauses : 75
% 0.41/0.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23
% 0.41/0.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Paramodulations : 38
% 0.41/0.60 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # NegExts : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Equation resolutions : 37
% 0.41/0.60 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 224
% 0.41/0.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 0.41/0.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Negative unit clauses : 107
% 0.41/0.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 89
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.41/0.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 95
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 232
% 0.41/0.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7376
% 0.41/0.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5024
% 0.41/0.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.41/0.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1436
% 0.41/0.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 218
% 0.41/0.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.41/0.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7382
% 0.41/0.60
% 0.41/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.60 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.41/0.60 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 2272 pages
% 0.41/0.60
% 0.41/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.60 # User time : 0.107 s
% 0.41/0.60 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Total time : 0.124 s
% 0.41/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 1904 pages
% 0.41/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------