TSTP Solution File: SWV963-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV963-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:15:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.44s 1.77s
% Output : Refutation 1.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWV963-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 11:41:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 1.30/1.67 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 1.30/1.67 Process 5445 was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 1.30/1.67 Wed Jun 15 11:41:26 2022
% 1.30/1.67 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_5292_n012.cluster.edu".
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_5292_n012.cluster.edu
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.30/1.67 set(auto2).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 1.30/1.67 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 1.30/1.67 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 1.30/1.67 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 1.30/1.67 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 1.30/1.67 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 1.30/1.67 assign(order,kbo).
% 1.30/1.67 set(lex_order_vars).
% 1.30/1.67 clear(print_given).
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (464 formulas)
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 1.30/1.67
% 1.30/1.67 Term ordering decisions:
% 1.30/1.67 Function symbol KB weights: tc_String_Ochar=1. tc_Value_Oval=1. tc_nat=1. v_P=1. tc_Type_Oty=1. c_Type_Oty_OBoolean=1. v_ha____=1. v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____=1. v_h_Ha____=1. c_Value_Oval_ONull=1. c_Type_Oty_ONT=1. v_E____=1. v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____=1. c_True=1. v_la____=1. c_False=1. c_Value_Oval_OUnit=1. v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____=1. c_Expr_Obop_OEq=1. v_v____=1. t_a=1. v_D____=1. v_F____=1. v_T____=1. v_l_Ha____=1. tc_prod=1. tc_fun=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow=1. hAPP=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OVal=1. c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl=1. c_TypeRel_Owiden=1. c_COMBI=1. tc_List_Olist=1. tc_Option_Ooption=1. tc_Expr_Oexp=1. c_SmallStep_Ored=1. c_Value_Oval_OBool=1. c_Value_Oval_OAddr=1. c_Type_Oty_OClass=1. c_fequal=1. c_State_Ohp=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OSeq=1. c_List_Olist_OCons=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OWhile=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCast=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OLAss=1. c_Conform_Oconf=1. c_Aux_Ofun__of=1. c_Pair=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCond=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc=1. c_Map_Omap__add=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCall=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OBlock=1. c_Wellfounded_Olex__prod=1. c_Recdef_Osame__fst=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch=1. c_WellType_Osko__WellType__XWT__elim__cases__2__1=1. c_WellType_Osko__WellType__XWT__elim__cases__2__2=1. v_sko__CHAINED__1=1. v_sko__local__XFAssRed2__2__1=1. v_sko__local__XFAssRed2__Xhyps__2__1=1. v_sko__local__XIH__1=1. c_Conform_Osko__Conform__Xconf__def__1__1=1. c_Conform_Osko__Conform__Xconfs__conv__map__1__1=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__2__1=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__2__2=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__7__1=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__1=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__5__1=1.
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 % Starting search at 0.14 seconds.
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.44/1.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.44/1.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 % Proof 1 at 0.24 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 1.44/1.77 % Length of proof is 6.
% 1.44/1.77 % Level of proof is 2.
% 1.44/1.77 % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 1.44/1.77 % Given clauses 362.
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 461 hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)) # label(cls_CHAINED_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.44/1.77 462 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)) # label(cls_CHAINED_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 1.44/1.77 463 -v_thesis____ # label(cls_conjecture_0) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.44/1.77 464 v_thesis____ | -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),A),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,A) # label(cls_conjecture_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.44/1.77 465 -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),A),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,A). [copy(464),unit_del(a,463)].
% 1.44/1.77 1169 $F. [resolve(465,b,462,a),unit_del(a,461)].
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 Given=362. Generated=1503. Kept=1070. proofs=1.
% 1.44/1.77 Usable=362. Sos=702. Demods=4. Limbo=0, Disabled=470. Hints=0.
% 1.44/1.77 Megabytes=6.96.
% 1.44/1.77 User_CPU=0.24, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 THEOREM PROVED
% 1.44/1.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.44/1.77
% 1.44/1.77 Process 5445 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 15 11:41:26 2022
% 1.44/1.77 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------