TSTP Solution File: SWV963-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SWV963-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 05:32:42 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.97s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_thesis____
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
    cls_CHAINED_1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SWV963-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 07:55:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.97/0.60  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.97/0.60  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.97/0.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # sh5l with pid 24573 completed with status 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.97/0.60  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.97/0.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.97/0.60  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.97/0.60  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24576 completed with status 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.97/0.60  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.97/0.60  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.97/0.60  # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.97/0.60  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.97/0.60  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 0.97/0.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 0.97/0.60  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.97/0.60  
% 0.97/0.60  # Proof found!
% 0.97/0.60  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.97/0.60  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.97/0.60  # Parsed axioms                        : 464
% 0.97/0.60  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 25
% 0.97/0.60  # Initial clauses                      : 439
% 0.97/0.60  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 439
% 0.97/0.60  # Processed clauses                    : 455
% 0.97/0.60  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.97/0.60  # ...subsumed                          : 92
% 0.97/0.60  # ...remaining for further processing  : 362
% 0.97/0.60  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.97/0.60  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.97/0.60  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 0.97/0.60  # ...of those cached                   : 3
% 0.97/0.60  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.97/0.60  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.97/0.60  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.97/0.60  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.97/0.60  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.97/0.60  # Current number of processed clauses  : 16
% 0.97/0.60  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.97/0.60  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.97/0.60  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.97/0.60  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
% 0.97/0.60  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 330
% 0.97/0.60  # ...number of literals in the above   : 613
% 0.97/0.60  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Current number of archived clauses   : 346
% 0.97/0.60  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24097
% 0.97/0.60  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14612
% 0.97/0.60  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
% 0.97/0.60  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2573
% 0.97/0.60  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 272
% 0.97/0.60  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.97/0.60  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 76314
% 0.97/0.60  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1218
% 0.97/0.60  
% 0.97/0.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.97/0.60  # User time                : 0.064 s
% 0.97/0.60  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.97/0.60  # Total time               : 0.077 s
% 0.97/0.60  # Maximum resident set size: 2808 pages
% 0.97/0.60  
% 0.97/0.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.97/0.60  # User time                : 0.105 s
% 0.97/0.60  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.97/0.60  # Total time               : 0.121 s
% 0.97/0.60  # Maximum resident set size: 2080 pages
% 0.97/0.60  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.97/0.60  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------