TSTP Solution File: SWV962-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:36:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.40s 1.71s
% Output   : Refutation 1.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   2 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;  12 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0,axiom,
    ( X = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(Y,Z,U,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(V,W,X1,Y1,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_wt_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wt_0) ).

cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X,Y),Z),Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(4648,plain,
    v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0,cls_wt_0]) ).

cnf(4650,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X),c_Type_Oty_OVoid))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,4648,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5177,plain,
    $false,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4650,cls_widen__refl_0,cls_CHAINED_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.09/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 07:58:10 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.42  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43  * 
% 0.14/0.43  * 
% 0.14/0.44  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.14/0.44  * 
% 0.14/0.44  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.14/0.44  * 
% 0.14/0.44  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.14/0.44   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.14/0.44   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.14/0.44   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.44   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.14/0.44   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.14/0.44   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.14/0.44   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.14/0.44   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.14/0.44   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.14/0.44   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.14/0.44   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.14/0.44   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.14/0.44  * 
% 0.14/0.44  "."
% 0.14/0.44  * 
% 0.14/0.44  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T07:58:10
% 0.14/0.44  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n015.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T07:58:10
% 0.31/0.56  WARNING:
% 0.31/0.56     |c_BigStep_Ofinal| is a 2-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  #||
% 1.40/1.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.40/1.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.40/1.71  ||#
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.40/1.71  ;      9634 formulas have been input or derived (from 263 formulas).
% 1.40/1.71  ;      5177 (54%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.40/1.71  ;           11 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.40/1.71  ;         5166 (100%) are still being kept.
% 1.40/1.71  ; 
% 1.40/1.71  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.082   7%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.008   1%   Assert                       (407 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.483  40%   Process new row              (8,878 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.182  15%   Resolution                   (524 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.012   1%   Paramodulation               (262 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.002   0%   Condensing                   (135 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.004   0%   Forward subsumption          (135 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.004   0%   Backward subsumption         (135 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.008   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (90 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.192  16%   Forward simplification       (8,873 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.126  10%   Backward simplification      (5,177 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.006   0%   Ordering                     (184 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     0.101   8%   Other
% 1.40/1.71  ;     1.211        Total
% 1.40/1.71  ;     1.271        Real time
% 1.40/1.71  ; 
% 1.40/1.71  ; Term-hash-array has 9,186 terms in all.
% 1.40/1.71  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 125 entries (125 at peak, 135 added, 10 deleted).
% 1.40/1.71  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 767 nodes (767 at peak, 932 added, 165 deleted).
% 1.40/1.71  ;  Retrieved 55 possibly forward subsuming rows in 135 calls.
% 1.40/1.71  ;  Retrieved 54 possibly backward subsumed rows in 135 calls.
% 1.40/1.71  ; Path-index has 9,164 entries (9,164 at peak, 9,209 added, 45 deleted).
% 1.40/1.71  ; Path-index has 13,390 nodes (13,390 at peak, 13,395 added, 5 deleted).
% 1.40/1.71  ; Trie-index has 9,164 entries (9,164 at peak, 9,209 added, 45 deleted).
% 1.40/1.71  ; Trie-index has 43,313 nodes (43,313 at peak, 43,333 added, 20 deleted).
% 1.40/1.71  ; Retrieved 4,093 generalization terms in 8,895 calls.
% 1.40/1.71  ; Retrieved 5,061 instance terms in 5,041 calls.
% 1.40/1.71  ; Retrieved 178,155 unifiable terms in 3,034 calls.
% 1.40/1.71  ; 
% 1.40/1.71  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 1.40/1.71  ;     1 with value 20              1 with value 22
% 1.40/1.71  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 27 entries:
% 1.40/1.71  ;     2 with value 42              3 with value 58               2 with value 82
% 1.40/1.71  ;     2 with value 44              3 with value 62               1 with value 86
% 1.40/1.71  ;     1 with value 53              2 with value 69               2 with value 90
% 1.40/1.71  ;     1 with value 54              2 with value 73               1 with value 110
% 1.40/1.71  ;     1 with value 57              4 with value 77
% 1.40/1.71  ; The agenda of rows to give has 4877 entries:
% 1.40/1.71  ;     1 with value (4 5)         610 with value (4 20)           3 with value (4 32)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     5 with value (4 8)         643 with value (4 21)           6 with value (4 33)
% 1.40/1.71  ;    24 with value (4 10)        653 with value (4 22)           6 with value (4 34)
% 1.40/1.71  ;     6 with value (4 11)        489 with value (4 23)           3 with value (4 35)
% 1.40/1.71  ;    49 with value (4 12)        375 with value (4 24)           4 with value (4 36)
% 1.40/1.71  ;    23 with value (4 13)        164 with value (4 25)           2 with value (4 37)
% 1.40/1.71  ;   109 with value (4 14)         80 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 38)
% 1.40/1.71  ;    90 with value (4 15)          9 with value (4 27)           3 with value (4 39)
% 1.40/1.71  ;   247 with value (4 16)          3 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 40)
% 1.40/1.71  ;   301 with value (4 17)          5 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 41)
% 1.40/1.71  ;   429 with value (4 18)          3 with value (4 30)           2 with value (4 42)
% 1.40/1.71  ;   521 with value (4 19)          4 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 45)
% 1.40/1.71  Evaluation took:
% 1.40/1.71    1.273 seconds of real time
% 1.40/1.71    1.141318 seconds of user run time
% 1.40/1.71    0.073849 seconds of system run time
% 1.40/1.71    [Run times include 0.108 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.40/1.71    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.40/1.71    0 page faults and
% 1.40/1.71    59,801,632 bytes consed.
% 1.40/1.71  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.40/1.71  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T07:58:11
% 1.40/1.71  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.40/1.71  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------