TSTP Solution File: SWV962-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:15:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.85s 1.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 07:47:54 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.85/1.40 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.85/1.40 Process 11291 was started by sandbox on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.85/1.40 Wed Jun 15 07:47:54 2022
% 0.85/1.40 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_11137_n005.cluster.edu".
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_11137_n005.cluster.edu
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.85/1.40 set(auto2).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.85/1.40 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.85/1.40 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.85/1.40 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.85/1.40 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.85/1.40 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.85/1.40 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.85/1.40 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.85/1.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (407 formulas)
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.85/1.40 Function symbol KB weights: tc_String_Ochar=1. c_Type_Oty_OVoid=1. tc_Type_Oty=1. c_Type_Oty_OBoolean=1. v_P=1. c_Type_Oty_ONT=1. v_E____=1. v_v____=1. v_C____=1. v_D____=1. v_F____=1. v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____=1. v_h_Ha____=1. v_ha____=1. v_TF____=1. v_T_092_060_094isub_0622_H____=1. v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____=1. v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____=1. t_a=1. v_T____=1. hAPP=1. c_TypeRel_Owiden=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow=1. tc_prod=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OVal=1. c_Option_Ooption_OSome=1. c_Objects_Otypeof__h=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Onew=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OVar=1. c_COMBI=1. tc_List_Olist=1. tc_Expr_Oexp=1. c_Type_Oty_OClass=1. c_fequal=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OSeq=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCast=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OLAss=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OWhile=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCond=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OBlock=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OCall=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__4=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss=1. c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__1=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__2=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__3=1. c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__5__1=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Oexp__case=1. c_Expr_Oexp_Oexp__rec__1=1.
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 % Starting search at 0.09 seconds.
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.85/1.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.85/1.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 % Proof 1 at 0.29 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.85/1.40 % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.85/1.40 % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.85/1.40 % Maximum clause weight is 29.000.
% 0.85/1.40 % Given clauses 321.
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 409 A = c_Type_Oty_OVoid | A = c_Type_Oty_OVoid | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(B,C,D,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(E,F,V6,V7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),A) # label(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.40 410 c_Type_Oty_OVoid = A | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(B,C,D,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(E,F,V6,V7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),A). [copy(409),flip(a),flip(b),merge(b)].
% 0.85/1.40 414 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____) # label(cls_wt_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.40 422 hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(A,B),C),C)) # label(cls_widen__refl_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.40 424 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) # label(cls_CHAINED_0) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.40 425 -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),A),v_T____)) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),A) # label(cls_conjecture_0) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.85/1.40 1103 v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid. [resolve(414,a,410,b),flip(a)].
% 0.85/1.40 1122 -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),A),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)) | -c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),A). [back_rewrite(425),rewrite([1103(11)])].
% 0.85/1.40 1259 $F. [resolve(1122,b,424,a),unit_del(a,422)].
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 Given=321. Generated=2013. Kept=1125. proofs=1.
% 0.85/1.40 Usable=320. Sos=794. Demods=350. Limbo=0, Disabled=418. Hints=0.
% 0.85/1.40 Megabytes=5.51.
% 0.85/1.40 User_CPU=0.29, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1.
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.85/1.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.85/1.40
% 0.85/1.40 Process 11291 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jun 15 07:47:55 2022
% 0.85/1.40 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------