TSTP Solution File: SWV962-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   9 unt;   1 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   5 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;  12 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (  25 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0,axiom,
    ( X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
    | X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yz5vZz65be/E---3.1_26118.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yz5vZz65be/E---3.1_26118.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yz5vZz65be/E---3.1_26118.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_wt_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yz5vZz65be/E---3.1_26118.p',cls_wt_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yz5vZz65be/E---3.1_26118.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
    cls_widen__refl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
    cls_wt_0 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
    cls_CHAINED_0 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.14  % Problem    : SWV962-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.06/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 03:44:39 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Yz5vZz65be/E---3.1_26118.p
% 0.20/0.55  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # new_bool_1 with pid 26198 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.55  # Search class: FGHSS-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # new_ho_10 with pid 26200 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.55  # Search class: FGHSS-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55  # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.55  # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.55  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.55  # Parsed axioms                        : 407
% 0.20/0.55  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 113
% 0.20/0.55  # Initial clauses                      : 294
% 0.20/0.55  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 294
% 0.20/0.55  # Processed clauses                    : 430
% 0.20/0.55  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # ...subsumed                          : 113
% 0.20/0.55  # ...remaining for further processing  : 317
% 0.20/0.55  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.20/0.55  # Generated clauses                    : 16
% 0.20/0.55  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.20/0.55  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Paramodulations                      : 3
% 0.20/0.55  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Equation resolutions                 : 13
% 0.20/0.55  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.20/0.55  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 134
% 0.20/0.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.20/0.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 106
% 0.20/0.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.20/0.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 47
% 0.20/0.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 121
% 0.20/0.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 183
% 0.20/0.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1977
% 0.20/0.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 810
% 0.20/0.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.20/0.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2280
% 0.20/0.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 19
% 0.20/0.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.55  # Condensation attempts                : 430
% 0.20/0.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6079
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.55  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.55  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.20/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 2312 pages
% 0.20/0.55  
% 0.20/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.20/0.55  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.55  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.20/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1972 pages
% 0.20/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------