TSTP Solution File: SWV961-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SWV961-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:55:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8C3Nm0JKqW/E---3.1_13406.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8C3Nm0JKqW/E---3.1_13406.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8C3Nm0JKqW/E---3.1_13406.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8C3Nm0JKqW/E---3.1_13406.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( v_thesis____
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
cls_that_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
cls_conjecture_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
cls_CHAINED_1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.22 % Problem : SWV961-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.08/0.22 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.22/0.42 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.42 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.22/0.42 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.22/0.42 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.22/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.22/0.42 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 03:18:20 EDT 2023
% 0.22/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.45/0.64 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.45/0.64 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8C3Nm0JKqW/E---3.1_13406.p
% 0.47/0.78 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.47/0.78 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.78 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # sh5l with pid 13487 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.47/0.78 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.78 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.47/0.78 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.78 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 13490 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.47/0.78 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.78 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.47/0.78 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.78 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.78 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.47/0.78 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.47/0.78
% 0.47/0.78 # Proof found!
% 0.47/0.78 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.47/0.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.78 # Parsed axioms : 546
% 0.47/0.78 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 28
% 0.47/0.78 # Initial clauses : 518
% 0.47/0.78 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Initial clauses in saturation : 518
% 0.47/0.78 # Processed clauses : 853
% 0.47/0.78 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.47/0.78 # ...subsumed : 126
% 0.47/0.78 # ...remaining for further processing : 721
% 0.47/0.78 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.47/0.78 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.47/0.78 # Generated clauses : 329
% 0.47/0.78 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 222
% 0.47/0.78 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Paramodulations : 282
% 0.47/0.78 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # NegExts : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Equation resolutions : 47
% 0.47/0.78 # Total rewrite steps : 85
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.78 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.78 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.78 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.78 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.78 # Current number of processed clauses : 314
% 0.47/0.78 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 62
% 0.47/0.78 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Negative unit clauses : 102
% 0.47/0.78 # Non-unit-clauses : 150
% 0.47/0.78 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 290
% 0.47/0.78 # ...number of literals in the above : 690
% 0.47/0.78 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Current number of archived clauses : 407
% 0.47/0.78 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 55050
% 0.47/0.78 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29722
% 0.47/0.78 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 27
% 0.47/0.78 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7583
% 0.47/0.78 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # BW rewrite match attempts : 210
% 0.47/0.78 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.47/0.78 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.47/0.78 # Termbank termtop insertions : 71437
% 0.47/0.78
% 0.47/0.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.78 # User time : 0.076 s
% 0.47/0.78 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.47/0.78 # Total time : 0.088 s
% 0.47/0.78 # Maximum resident set size: 2872 pages
% 0.47/0.78
% 0.47/0.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.78 # User time : 0.110 s
% 0.47/0.78 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.47/0.78 # Total time : 0.128 s
% 0.47/0.78 # Maximum resident set size: 2128 pages
% 0.47/0.78 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.47/0.78 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------